Skip to comments.
Diary (lame Guardian hit piece on FR)
The Guardian ^
| 9-16-04
| Tim Dowlin
Posted on 09/16/2004 3:54:12 AM PDT by Always Right
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
Hate to inform such an intelligent person that they have no clue what first amendment rights are. But first of all, being that you are not an American citizen, Our Constitution doesn't cover you. Second, only the government can violate it, not a handicaped man in Fresno. Third, Freerepublic's first amendment right includes the right to ban unwanted disrupters, or any poster for that matter.
Frankly, I am disappointed he lasted two-minutes.
To: Always Right
Crazy right-wing nerd reporting for duty!
2
posted on
09/16/2004 3:58:11 AM PDT
by
stockpirate
(Kerry; supported by, financed by, trained by, guided by, revered by, in favor of, Communists.)
To: Always Right
3
posted on
09/16/2004 3:59:02 AM PDT
by
Crazieman
(Hanoi John Effin Kerry. War Criminal. Traitor. Democrat.)
To: Always Right
Yes, hear, hear! Death to the accounts of internet disrupters and their running dog nonsense.
4
posted on
09/16/2004 3:59:36 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: Crazieman
Note - this also might explain the sudden influx of ultra-liberal British "over the ponders"
5
posted on
09/16/2004 4:00:22 AM PDT
by
Crazieman
(Hanoi John Effin Kerry. War Criminal. Traitor. Democrat.)
To: Always Right
Hey, at least they spelled FreeRepublic correctly. Any press is good press. (except an endorsement from Dan Ra
ther)
/john
To: stockpirate
But the question is, are you in pjs?
7
posted on
09/16/2004 4:01:46 AM PDT
by
netmilsmom
(Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
To: Always Right
He's just grousing because he got what he deserved.
We at FR exercise our right to free association and assembly, and that includes following the rules. Comply or don't. It's your choice.
8
posted on
09/16/2004 4:02:19 AM PDT
by
GVnana
(If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
To: Always Right
...we've examined your posting, Geoff, and we can't see anything untoward...Skunks don't know they stink, Tim.
9
posted on
09/16/2004 4:02:19 AM PDT
by
Byron_the_Aussie
(http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
A Guardian writer is whining about his getting the Almighty Zot?!
BWAAAHAHAHAHAAA!!!!! Hey, Timmy! You really ought to read the rules before you try to enter a PRIVATE FORUM!
Loser!
10
posted on
09/16/2004 4:03:07 AM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">Hatriotism)
To: netmilsmom
Yes I am , and I only have on my PJ pants!
11
posted on
09/16/2004 4:05:04 AM PDT
by
stockpirate
(Kerry; supported by, financed by, trained by, guided by, revered by, in favor of, Communists.)
To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
Just damn.
If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
12
posted on
09/16/2004 4:05:23 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: Always Right
Must of been the smell...
13
posted on
09/16/2004 4:05:46 AM PDT
by
DB
(©)
To: stockpirate
Tim Dowlin please explain how in the world the DNC maneuvered the worst possible candidate, next to Al Sharpton, to outflank Howard Dean, that gets the nomination to run for President? Then he choses Edwards, who wasn't going to even be recollected in his home state, as a winning ticket?
Kerry, who can't run on his track record in the Senate, and has at the least, a questionable Vietnam war record, could even be conceived as a winning candidate?!
A guy who doesn't even have the appeal of his own party?
You were saying, Tim?
To: Always Right
Excuse me while I get out of my pajamas, and put on my dacron suit(with
nerdy pocket protector).
I better put some new tape on my glasses, too.
15
posted on
09/16/2004 4:06:44 AM PDT
by
Jackknife
(.......Land of the Free,because of the Brave.)
To: Always Right
LOL! The "logical conclusion" of believing Hillary would act in her own self-interest is that "A vote for Bush in 2004 is a vote for Hillary in 2008"? You've gotta be -kiddin'- me!
LOL. The Guardian is BRAGGING about deliberately trolling with completely ludicrous logic that would insult the intelligence of... well, of a Guardian editor, and then they have the -nerve- to sarcastically proclaim "Proper debate at last!"?!
How freakin' pathetic. LOL. I can't believe they're bragging about deliberate trolling.
Qwinn
16
posted on
09/16/2004 4:07:06 AM PDT
by
Qwinn
To: Always Right
Someone is actually paying this dork to troll FR, then write about it? Someone too stupid to know, a.) that England has no 1st Amendment, and b.) that a private web site has no obligation to afford such losers a voice, 1st Amendment or no?
Must be easy to work for the Guardian.
17
posted on
09/16/2004 4:07:29 AM PDT
by
spodefly
(A bunny-slippered operative in the Vast Right-Wing Pajama Party!)
To: Always Right
As a Brit, I can tell you that the Guardian believes in only one freedom: speech ("the right to gossip, exaggerate and whine").
18
posted on
09/16/2004 4:07:49 AM PDT
by
TaxRelief
(Kerry lied and good men died, and Moms worried, and heroes were spit on, and children were ostraci..)
To: stockpirate
19
posted on
09/16/2004 4:08:14 AM PDT
by
netmilsmom
(Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
To: Always Right
those crazy rightwing nerdsHAH! I'm a Information Technology Architect.. and I have bi-polar disorder. I've been outed! :-} Better them than James Carville I suppose!
Yes, the left is so compassionate
20
posted on
09/16/2004 4:08:42 AM PDT
by
DaveMSmith
(Providence Has Favored Our Undertakings)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson