Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pharmer

Plain and simple. For legal reasons. You see, if and when the documents are proven to be fakes, forgeries, if you will, then c-BS and Dan Rather have to disclose their source(s). Which then opens them up to the charge of illegally influencing a presidential election. ie: watergate. Only in this case its memogate.


9 posted on 09/15/2004 8:18:47 PM PDT by onyx eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: onyx eyes
Plain and simple. For legal reasons. You see, if and when the documents are proven to be fakes, forgeries, if you will, then c-BS and Dan Rather have to disclose their source(s). Which then opens them up to the charge of illegally influencing a presidential election. ie: watergate. Only in this case its memogate.

I agree. They never expected anyone to question the memo.
It's a new world with the Internet, and the old school Democrats aren't ready for it.
They thought their old Vince Forster trick would work again. The same guy who claims this forgery is real is the same guy who said Vince Fosters suicide note was real. It would be nice to go back and check that letter once more.

41 posted on 09/15/2004 8:33:51 PM PDT by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson