Skip to comments.
Guard Secretary, Flight Instructor Chip Away at CBS Story
Talon News ^
| 9/15/04
| Bobby Eberle and Jeff Gannon
Posted on 09/15/2004 5:58:47 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: wagglebee
Mapes will be fired.
Rather will resign.
21
posted on
09/15/2004 6:39:09 PM PDT
by
PokeyJoe
(The plural for RAT is RATS, not RATICS)
To: NavySEAL F-16
ha! another witness just like that stupid ben barnes democratic fundraiser from texas who lied about helping bush! they will SAY anything to trash him! man, are they DESPERATE or what!
bizarre..bizarre...bizarre...an 86 year old lady contradicting herself about conversations she never witnessed 30 years ago by a guy who's been dead for 20 years. can it GET ANY WORSE?
22
posted on
09/15/2004 6:39:29 PM PDT
by
wildwood
To: NavySEAL F-16
JUMPED THE SHARK!!! (5 days ago actually)
23
posted on
09/15/2004 6:40:11 PM PDT
by
wildwood
To: PokeyJoe
Rather will resign. My guess is that he will retire to save face.
24
posted on
09/15/2004 6:40:20 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
(Benedict Arnold was for American independence before he was against it.)
To: ctdonath2
25
posted on
09/15/2004 6:41:59 PM PDT
by
NavySEAL F-16
(Proud to be a Reagan Republican)
To: wildwood
AND FURTHER....
last week, Knox said she had no firsthand knowledge of Bush's time with the Texas Air National Guard, although she did recall a culture of special treatment for the sons of prominent people, such as Bush and others.
it was a "CULTURE"...nothing overt...a CULTURE...she knows nothing specific but she FELT it was a CULTURE...BLAH!
26
posted on
09/15/2004 6:48:02 PM PDT
by
wildwood
To: wagglebee
"My guess is that he will retire to save face."
==============================================================
NO NO NO !!! I don't want Gunga Dan to retire yet.
I want to see him crying on the air in the first week of November.
27
posted on
09/15/2004 6:50:29 PM PDT
by
Rockpile
To: Wild Irish Rogue
In so many words, she claimed that the young pilots told her their innermost secrets and resentments. Of which she has total recall, 35 years later.You'd be surprised. My mom is a retired school teacher and I'll occassionally run into grown adults that were in her 3rd grade class. I'll tell my mom about it later and she'll remember that person, who his brothers and sisters were and details about his personality, etc. She can't remember important details of my childhood but she sure remembers some kid she knew for 9 months 20 years ago.
28
posted on
09/15/2004 6:52:07 PM PDT
by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: Rockpile
Maybe if we're lucky, they'll find him in a "spider hole"
29
posted on
09/15/2004 6:57:33 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
(Benedict Arnold was for American independence before he was against it.)
To: wagglebee
"People will be fired, the program loses its credibility and Dan Rather ends a distinguished career with his reputation besmirched," Grossman added.
Yes, I hope this happens sooner Rather than later.
To: wagglebee
>last week, Knox said she had no firsthand knowledge of Bush's >time with the Texas Air National Guard, although she did >recall a culture of special treatment for the sons of >prominent people, such as Bush and others.
So they are accusing the President of the United States of a military criminal offense on the basis that an 86 year old woman's (that is probably too old to drive) OPINION of a CULTURE of special treatment. Not even an EXACT accusation of Bush, but a culture. Total BS all the way.
31
posted on
09/15/2004 7:26:09 PM PDT
by
sandbar
To: wagglebee
The real issue is that Rather did not present these documents last week as questionable, he presented them as factual, authenticated documents. Now to change the story, he's been proven to have lied, and his own words convict him of that. He misled the viewers to get his point of view accepted to make a stronger, but false, case against Bush. If last week he had presented them as documents that had come to him, but that he could not attest to their validity, we would all be screaming "foul", Rather would still have been accused of being biased or partisan, but he wouldn't be accused of lying in a way that could make it stick. Well, that is not what he did. He presented one side of a story without presenting both sides to allow the public to decide. He, in his arrogance, decided himself for the "little people". That's why I like Fox News. The "We report, you decide" motto is what I like about it. When there are two sides, they present both sides.
If this were a criminal case in California, and Rather were the prosecutor, he would be censured by the court for not revealing that he had exculpatory evicence, that he was railroading an innocent defendant to prison.
To: wagglebee
![](http://www.registeredmedia.com/gallery/albums/m
edia/danrather/cbs.jpg)
Fax# (212) 975-1998
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson