Brit has corrected him a dozen times but Juan has a learning disabilty.(Liberalitis)
The only thing they have on the SwiftVets is that the official Navy report matches what Kerry says. Of course, Kerry wrote it, but that doesn't matter.
no--it's just the demo talking points that they all try to get in... they care nothing about the truth...
There was a periodic (weekly, monthly, something) Navy report that disagreed with some of their claims. But the Swiftee rebuttal is that Kerry wrote the original (false) after action report that the periodic report was based on. Koolaid drinkers think that because this was an "official Navy document" instead of the memories of the 30 or so guys on that patrol, then it must be believed and not them.
That's leftist "proof" for you.
Meanwhile, you can demonstrate all day long their memo's are fake and they won't buy it.
I don't care what they think anymore.
I haven't read their book, but I thought it was footnoted or documented.
Yep, you missed something on Swift Vets being proven wrong.
Here is the irrefutable evidence that the Swift Vets are lying dogs:
1. Kerry had to admit that he had not encountered enemy fire EVER prior to and for nine days after his self-inflicted wound that resulted in his "first purple heart"
2. Kerry had to admit that he was not in Cambodia for the Christmas that was "seared, seared into" him.
3. Kerry's own biography and multiple versions of the "no man left behind" dramatic rescue of Rassmann contradicts the purple heart awarded for that incident.
4. Kerry has had to admit that, well, maybe the other boats didn't flee the scene while his boat alone helped the swift boat disabled by the mine. In fact every boat except for his stayed to help while his turned tail and took off down the river.
5. The after action report, recently released from Navy Archives, AND VERIFIED AS AUTHENTIC BY THE NAVY, clearly shows that Kerry's Silver Star (with illegal combat "V") was won, not by facing a force vastly superior in numbers, but rather by chasing down a lone VC teen, already wounded in the leg with a .50 caliber bullet, and shooting him in the back, behind a hootch.
So, you can clearly see that Kerry, by yielding to the facts and recanting his stories has completely proven the Swift Vets to be lying.
And Dan Rather will vouch for the authenticity of his stand.
I've heard Williams and others say the SwiftVets' charges have been discredited, but I haven't seen that information. Someone recently reported (Major Garrett?) that Kerry's Christmas in Cambodia has been shown to be a lie and his campaign has admitted that "possibly" it is true that Kerry's first PH came from a non-intentional self-inflicted wound.