Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
The efforts they're redoubling are merely to corroborate the accuracy of their existing report. By redoubling, they're continuing their biased search for corroborating evidence that will fit what they a priori believed to be the accuracy of their story.

The fact that they not yet provided any other substantiation, while having thrust forward such feeble forgeries about which they were warned in multiple ways aforehand, under the guise of having been vetted by a legitimate news organization, speaks volumes of substantiation concerning their transparent and corrupt attempts to influence an election on the basis of documents they had every reason to believe were forged.

They have shown they are partisans shills outside the mainstream ethics of journalism, ready and willing to trade reputation for momentary corrupt influence.

Just as their rationalization for bypassing the documents' authenticity question to advocate for the so-called accuracy of something fraudulently represented is not logical, Heyward's current statement cleaves to SeeBS's unsubstantianted premise they claim to believe (against reason) to be true. They would sucker all of us with this Leftist heart-felt old saw, that is, their so-called belief. A lawyer knows how to defend an individual against claims of lying if the individual "believes" what he's saying, but these are corporate lies, propped up with the strongest tenuous support they've got, that is, fraudulently produced documents represented by SeeBS if not the counterfeiter(s) to be government documents. Lawmakers long ago clarified these circumstances to be criminal violations, with serious consequences.

SeeBS's "belief" in this context is a lie, told to their corrupted Kool-aid drinkers so as to perpetuate their undeserved lofty journalistic reputation and government-influencing past, while harkening to an individual's get-out-of-jail-free impetus for saying that which can be proved to be false.

SeeBS has surprised the citizenry for the last time concerning their willingness to use jihadist tactics: being willing, figuratively, to blow themselves and their employees' reputations up for their corrupt, partisan cause.

SeeBS seeks to convert its constituents' ideological generosity and the fog of time to lift themselves from the hook onto which they've climbed. But, as the saying goes, "Elephants don't forget."

As capitalists we can refuse to help SeeBS pay their employees, and as a republic with a still-functioning judiciary, we should prosecute the perpetrators for the felonies they've committed and other laws they may have broken, in full measure.

HF

380 posted on 09/15/2004 8:18:41 PM PDT by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: holden
The public needs to be reminded of the frauds that CBS has aired.

CBS is institutionally flawed, and needs to die. Arthur Anderson did.

381 posted on 09/15/2004 8:23:42 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies ]

To: holden
Sent this to CBS news. I just can't believe this and feel the need to share.

CBS News,

I can't believe it!!! Oh how the mighty have fallen! The emperor wears no clothes! You folks are still asking - no pompously demanding - that the president respond to allegations contained in an obviously forged memo!? This is great!! I never thought I would witness the complete meltdown of a news organization in my lifetime. CBS news will be lucky to survive. How could you expect to come out of this untarnished? You have gone from independent reporting (even if there has been a little bit of a left wing bias) to out-in-the-open mud-slinging for the DNC and Kerry campaign. Terry McCauliffe must be proud.

You've got tunnel vision. You focus on the lies that you started with and refuse to acknowledge any opposing facts as they come in. I recommend taking a step back and looking at the evidence anew. Fonts don't lie. There is no dispute that these memos are forgeries even if Dan Rather (and apparently everyone else at CBS news) can't keep up or understand the technology. I thought you guys were good with nuance and intricacies. Killian's family even disputes them. People he worked with dispute them. The cranky partisan old lady interviewed tonight even says they are fakes. Oh... but you latch onto the fact that she says that the content reflects what was going on at the time and that there were probably memos like these. Where are they?!?! REMEMBER - You're a news organization for God's sakes!!! I can't believe it simply because Dan Rather trots out every couple of days and says that he stands by the story. Am I supposed to believe CBS news because you say it's so or my own lyin' eyes?

I've got the popcorn going and I can't wait to see how this ends. I've got a feeling you guys ain't gonna like the finish.

Courage,

Name
Address

PS - Any luck getting Kerry to sign his SF 180? I'm sure you'll push this just as hard as you've been pushing the Bush Texas ANG story.
384 posted on 09/15/2004 8:30:14 PM PDT by Sodbuster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson