[KJacob]

I wouldn't be surprised if they said that they never claimed the documents were real, but instead they were "recreations" or "dramatic presentations" based on actual testimony.

Boy I hope they try this. The documents have a signature. That would be to admit fraud.

[TravisBickle]

The documents have a signature. That would be to admit fraud.

Don't you see? That was part of the dramatic presentation.

It was an "authenic replica" of the signature. For dramtic purposes, of course.