Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PsyOp
Actually they can, so long as they are not armed.

Picky, Picky, Picky. ;^>

OK, fixed wing combat aircraft. Satisfied now, Colnel Billy Mitchell?

Obviously you're right (and more knowledgable about this than I am, though I love the design of the Bronco). Point still stands, though.

28 posted on 09/15/2004 3:01:00 PM PDT by Phsstpok (often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Phsstpok

I wasn't trying to be picky, just trying clarify things. I agree with your point though on why the AF is probably going with the VSTOL F-35. They hate having an aircraft that has no other role than to support ground-pounders. Even though the pilots that fly it swear by it.

Even so, the Warthog will be around for a while yet. They AF committed to a major upgrade program for them. Besides, before the AF will be allowed to get rid of them, they will have to prove that the F-35 can do what it does as well as the A-10. The Warthog has too strong a following.


36 posted on 09/15/2004 3:22:49 PM PDT by PsyOp (Good sense, not age, brings wisdom. Sensus, non aetas, invenit sapientem. – Syrus, Maxims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson