Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kissinger Opposes U.S. Intel Czar
FoxNews.com ^ | 9-15-04 | David S. Hirschman

Posted on 09/15/2004 9:42:53 AM PDT by SmithPatterson

Kissinger Opposes U.S. Intel Czar, Is 'Optimistic' About Mideast Peace

Wednesday, September 15, 2004

By David S. Hirschman

Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger (search) said Monday he was "uneasy" about uniting all of the country's intelligence operations under a single chief, he worried about the possibility of a nuclear Iran and he's "optimistic" the disputed security fence in Israel might eventually result in a negotiated solution to the Middle East conflict.

Speaking at a luncheon hosted by the Marine Corps Scholarship Foundation in Manhattan, Kissinger, who served as secretary of state under presidents Richard Nixon (search) and Gerald Ford (search), touched on several major foreign policy issues currently affecting the U.S.

Kissinger said that while he believed the 9/11 commission had done a great public service, he did not agree with all of the commission's recommendations and he did not think that the country should act on the recommendations before the November presidential election. Particularly, he worried that by creating a single intelligence chief, dissenting views in the intelligence community would be stifled.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ciareform; intelligence; intelreform

1 posted on 09/15/2004 9:42:53 AM PDT by SmithPatterson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

I am against the creation of a new intel "czar" position. We already have such a position, it is the Director of Central Intelligence. If you don't like the job he's doing, replace him, don't just give him a new boss.

The intel failures of the nineties were not a result of not enough insulation between the president and the intel specialists, we didn't fail for lack of enough layers of bureaucracy, we didn't fail because of too many competing sources of information. Quite the contrary. We need competing voices, and the president needs to hear those voices. Creating another filter is precisely the wrong thing to do.


2 posted on 09/15/2004 9:57:10 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

And enough with this "czar" business (drug czar, intelligence czar...)! Czars = unaccountable, autocratic tyrants. Words mean something -- we should NOT accept such language in the US government.


3 posted on 09/15/2004 10:11:01 AM PDT by ellery (Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

Has Kissinger turned into a Lich yet? I'm amazed. The man never stops.


4 posted on 09/15/2004 10:40:59 AM PDT by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

WHO cares what "Kissinger" thinks?????


5 posted on 09/15/2004 10:42:44 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

Kissinger is right.......IT'S THE WALL, STUPID!


6 posted on 09/15/2004 10:43:28 AM PDT by OldFriend (It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson