Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: radicalamericannationalist
I'm sorry, if we all wanted the same thing, there would be lots more prosecutions of the large corporations that hire illegals.

Problem: you want prosecutions. US Attorneys want convictions (i.e., successful prosecutions). They tried this after the 1986 amnesty. Juries refused to convict, despite open-and-shut cases against the employers. Basically, the jurors engaged in jury nullification.

45 posted on 09/14/2004 6:53:37 PM PDT by Poohbah (If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah

Then I'm sorry, those were some piss poor prosecutions. It's not just the facts but the presentation (i.e. OJ)


52 posted on 09/14/2004 7:31:13 PM PDT by radicalamericannationalist (The Convention convinced me. 4 MORE YEARS!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah
Basically, the jurors engaged in jury nullification.

According to the FR Consensus it seems that jury nullification is gooooood unless it's in an immigration case, when it's baaaaaad. Got it.

70 posted on 09/15/2004 11:59:18 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson