To: radicalamericannationalist
I'm sorry, if we all wanted the same thing, there would be lots more prosecutions of the large corporations that hire illegals.Problem: you want prosecutions. US Attorneys want convictions (i.e., successful prosecutions). They tried this after the 1986 amnesty. Juries refused to convict, despite open-and-shut cases against the employers. Basically, the jurors engaged in jury nullification.
45 posted on
09/14/2004 6:53:37 PM PDT by
Poohbah
(If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
To: Poohbah
Then I'm sorry, those were some piss poor prosecutions. It's not just the facts but the presentation (i.e. OJ)
To: Poohbah
Basically, the jurors engaged in jury nullification.According to the FR Consensus it seems that jury nullification is gooooood unless it's in an immigration case, when it's baaaaaad. Got it.
70 posted on
09/15/2004 11:59:18 AM PDT by
Chemist_Geek
("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson