Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
"The "source" who marketed the originals wasn't peddling "memo's" but rather hand-scrawled, incomplete notes that somebody pulled out of the file when they were emptying Killian's office."

But 20 years ago Bush Jr. was not in politics and no one would have had a motive to do what you suggest. I'm convinced the memos are of recent origin.
257 posted on 09/14/2004 3:57:42 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle

Bush Sr. was in politics and there was talk of a run for Senate against Ben Barnes. So Barnes would have wanted to dig up dirt on anyone in the family.


260 posted on 09/14/2004 4:02:37 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

To: Steve_Seattle
oh, the "memo's" them selves are recent.

Absolutely.

Somebody, probably right after April this year, re-typed them. transcribed them, but screwed up big-time and tried to "make them look real" instead of just notes.

But Barnes could easily have gotten the hand-scrawled notes they came from (remember her comments!)

And Barnes would have been TX governor, running now (or running instead of Clinton in 92) if the Sharpstown scandal hadn't been exposed.

Revenge for losing the Presidency is a big reason to keep the memo's/copies of the memo's.
261 posted on 09/14/2004 4:04:34 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson