She says the info in the memos was accurate, but it could not have been since Saudt was retired at the time. Also, the other people who were there say that the Colonel was complimentary of Bush.
She hasn't actually said that the memos were accurate. The article merely states:
but that they reflect real documents that once existed.
Who knows what she means by this? Was she asked about each of the memos seperately? Is she saying that they merely reflect the fact that Killian kept memos to himself? We really don't know what she meant until someone asks her.