Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former secretary says she didn't type memos
Dallas Morning News ^ | 9/14/04

Posted on 09/14/2004 2:18:24 PM PDT by ambrose

Former secretary says she didn't type memos 04:10 PM CDT on Tuesday, September 14, 2004

By PETE SLOVER / The Dallas Morning News

HOUSTON – The former secretary for the Texas Air National Guard colonel who supposedly authored memos critical of President Bush’s Guard service said Tuesday that the documents are fake, but that they reflect real documents that once existed.

Marian Carr Knox, who worked from 1956 to 1979 at Ellington Air Force Base in Houston, said she prided herself on meticulous typing, and the memos first disclosed by CBS News last week were not her work.

“These are not real,” she told The Dallas Morning News after examining copies of the disputed memos for the first time. “They’re not what I typed, and I would have typed them for him.”

Mrs. Knox, 86, who spoke with precise recollection about dates, people and events, said she is not a supporter of Mr. Bush, who she deemed “unfit for office” and “selected, not elected.”

“I remember very vividly when Bush was there and all the yak-yak that was going on about it,” she said.

(Excerpt) Read more at dallasnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: killian; mariancarrknox; napalminthemorning; rathergate; tang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-354 next last
To: slimer
I wonder what model of typewriter she used?

From Post#86. She said the typeface on the documents did not match either of the two typewriters that she used during her time at the Guard.

She identified those machines as a mechanical Olympia, which was replaced by an IBM Selectric in the early 1970s.

181 posted on 09/14/2004 3:09:15 PM PDT by handy (Forgive me this day, my daily typos...The Truth is not a Smear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

e-mail: slashdot@slashdot.com
password: slashdot


182 posted on 09/14/2004 3:09:22 PM PDT by The Californian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

bugmenot.com

They have passwords and registration for tons of newspapers.


183 posted on 09/14/2004 3:09:57 PM PDT by Not gonna take it anymore (". . . stability cannot be purchased at the expense of liberty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Timeout

Then be ripped apart by us, the blogs, talk radio, some cable, probably some of the Old media still sensing blood.

I dare them to feature her as their star witness. :-D


184 posted on 09/14/2004 3:10:06 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Marian...Carr Knox? Hmm.


185 posted on 09/14/2004 3:10:20 PM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Time for Dan Rather to take it like a man. He's been dishing it our for years...

Turnabout is fair play. It's time for Rather to admit his bias and double standards.


186 posted on 09/14/2004 3:10:57 PM PDT by gortklattu (check out thotline dot com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
username: smogpro@hotmail.com
password: boring

We have a winner. That one works. Thanks.

187 posted on 09/14/2004 3:11:16 PM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Let's see the 'originals' appear and we can check--

CBS experts will vouch for their authenticity. No. You can't have their names.

188 posted on 09/14/2004 3:11:39 PM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Question Liberal Authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: handy

username: slashdot@slashdot.com
password: slashdot


189 posted on 09/14/2004 3:11:40 PM PDT by The Californian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: VisualizeSmallerGovernment
Be careful. She just might type some up. She's already outed herself as the one person who could do it. As Terry McAuliffe would gently explain to her, it sure would be a shame if the same thing happened to her that happened to Buddy the Dog.

Let her try and do it. No new documents will hold up under proper scrutiny.

190 posted on 09/14/2004 3:12:01 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Exactly, just WHY would there be all this "yakking" about GWBush not serving back then? Just how "famous" were the BUSH Men in 1972?? Did someone already know HW was going to be President? What was he doing back then...? CIA?

Another blah de blah...

G


191 posted on 09/14/2004 3:12:08 PM PDT by GRRRRR ( Love America? Vote GOP...early and often...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: VisualizeSmallerGovernment
Unless the serious charge is that a Network Anchor is fabricating news.

Oh, well, of course the rules are different if conservatives are making the accusations. We're paranoid racist evil fear-mongers engaging in the politics of personal destruction.
192 posted on 09/14/2004 3:12:16 PM PDT by Thrusher (The timing of this post is suspicious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter

I'll raise you a Fawn Hall...


193 posted on 09/14/2004 3:12:26 PM PDT by Husker8877
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: All
"The memos, if real, would show that as a pilot, Mr. Bush defied a direct order to obtain a flight physical, enjoyed the benefit of pressure from high officials to “sugar coat” his record, and was grounded for failing to meet military performance standards."

Even if that is all 100% true - so what?

No pilot ever missed a physical?
Nobody in the NG at the time went there to avoid combat?
No soldier ever received unfairly favorable reviews?

Who cares? This whole thing is a total non-issue and will have virtually no effect on the election at all. Its just a bunch of name-calling versus the Swifties debate which is about actual collaboration with the enemy during time of war.
194 posted on 09/14/2004 3:12:29 PM PDT by cdrw (Freedom and responsibility are inseparable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Interesting how everyone involved say these memos are fake. All the experts say these memos are fake.

Seems like the only two agencies that don't get that simply reality are CBS and Bill O'Reilly. According to O'Reilly he has no idea whether they're fake or not.

What is up with that clown?

195 posted on 09/14/2004 3:13:19 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I wonder if this woman is one of the sources relied on by CBS. Here's how it goes:

1. Kerry operatives hear stories from the Bush-hating bluehair about comments made about Bush when he was in the National Guard. She probably makes them up or exaggerates a few comments that she heard, because it seems that Bush was well liked and did a good job.

2. They use that information as the basis to gin up some phony memos to file from Killian so they can tie it in to an ad campaign they want to run this fall.

3. They give the docs to CBS, and point CBS to the Bluehair, who can verify that these "sentiments" were expressed by the officers at the time. The Bluehair does verify the sentiments, but they don't show her the documents.

4. Now that the jig is up, they trot out the bluehair so at least they can get some mileage from her (false) claim that officers at the TANG thought Bush was receiving favoritism.

196 posted on 09/14/2004 3:14:08 PM PDT by Defiant (The Democrat ticket has Johnarea, an STD (SocialisticallyTransmitted Disease).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
btw who keeps a CYA's file at work...typed ones at THAT!.....

"Miss Knox, please take a memo to cover my ass."

197 posted on 09/14/2004 3:15:54 PM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Question Liberal Authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Husker8877

Is that draped or undraped Fawn Hall?


198 posted on 09/14/2004 3:15:57 PM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
said she is not a supporter of Mr. Bush, who she deemed “unfit for office” and “selected, not elected.”

Awwww....too bad. She just blew any objective perspective she might have brought to the table with that last statement.

"So...Ms. Knox, did you...or did you not type these memos?

"No, I did not...but I think the sentime-"

"Ms. Knox, thank you - peddle your unsubstantiated opinions elsewhere...Your witness!"

199 posted on 09/14/2004 3:16:00 PM PDT by guitfiddlist (Hate is a DNC Family Value)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GRRRRR
Yakking

I agree - see my post #180. Back then, Bush Sr hadn't even been elected Veep, much less president. There is no particular reason for Bush to have stood out as some kind of celebrity.
200 posted on 09/14/2004 3:16:33 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-354 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson