[wbill]

Was it fear of being called a chauvinist, a desire to be "progressive" or what?

Bluntly, I think it was a desire to get laid. I think that most men would put up with almost anything in the pursuit of sex. But I'm a pessimist.

[Smogger]

Bluntly, I think it was a desire to get laid. I think that most men would put up with almost anything in the pursuit of sex. But I'm a pessimist.

Well that's what I figured it was. The countries future sold down the river for a piece of ass. Western Europe here we come.

[JPJones]

Bluntly, I think it was a desire to get laid.

This is the most honest statement yet on this thread.

[Dan Evans]

Bluntly, I think it was a desire to get laid. I think that most men would put up with almost anything in the pursuit of sex. But I'm a pessimist.

You may be on to something. PJ O'rourke described liberal men as guys who allow women to lead them around by their willies like little pull toys.

Women used to be more conservative than men. What Democrats have succeeded in doing is to use the natural female maternal instinct to turn the federal bureaucracy into the nanny state.