Posted on 09/14/2004 8:30:33 AM PDT by cryptical
Here we go... we'll see the usual posting from the "two wrongs don't make a right" morality crowd versus the "don't tell me what's right and wrong" libertarian crowd. But let's go, I do enjoy the debate.
Consider that Asa Hutchinson used to be Drug Czar. Now he runs "border security."
No matter what you think of the Drug War, you have to believe that people like Asa Hutchinson are from a species of poisonously treasonous evil people.
John Walters will blandly look you right in the eye and lie. About anything. Pure EVIL.
What I want to know is why we insist on calling our government officials "czars." Drug czar, intelligence czar... Since when is "czar" a favorable or even neutral term? Why is our government openly using a term that is synonomous with "tyrant?"
It's a small point, but I have to wonder whether it indicates the wrong mindset among the people we've hired to govern.
Correlation does not prove causation.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12533121&dopt=Abstract
In other words if I find out all the hoopla is overblown, I'm going to tend to disbelieve other warnings about other illegal and legal drugs. Similarly, if Dan Rather tells me a lie, I'm going to disbelieve other things he says too.
I think it's part of "the buck stops here" syndrome. In the face of an ever growing federal bureaucracy, people want easy answers and someone to blame when things go wrong.
The price of drugs continues to decline. The quality increases. A six pack of beer is more expensive.
Thanks government.
I'll bet all those young cannabis users tried tabacco first, then moved on.
If we're going to ban drugs, let's start with the original sin that leads to all the others ...
When are these people going to wake up to the fact that millions of people have actually smoked pot and they know for a pure fact that it's not a "killer drug"?
This is like saying 100% of heroin users ingested a carbonated soft drink within 3 months of using - 7Up "experimenters" beware of danger!
Hyperbole - the Un-Argument.
I see more as an MSM to pigeon hole FR as drug legalization wackos.
This happens every time some good PR goes to FR.
(BTW oreily has also officially jumped the shark, recent commecial has him attacking "rightwing radio".)
Milk?
If Vancouver B.C. is a shining example of a rational drug policy, then count me with the irrational. I was looking around the popular section of downtown looking for a restaurant and had 6 people try to sell me dope in less than 30 min.
You don't really believe that bunk, do you???
Then shouldn't it be the "drug whipping boy" or the "intelligence scapegoat?" Czars historically are NOT accountable to the people...
Well if they put it on the menu, they'd put the street entrepreneurs out of business.
Our government likes authoritarian labels. They invoke fear and hopefully obedience in the serfs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.