Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rather's CBS Colleagues in 'Deep Distress'
NewsMax .com ^ | 9/14/04 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 09/14/2004 6:16:18 AM PDT by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-243 next last
To: kjam22

"I figure he'll go about another year and then retire. They don't want him to "resign" and ruin his career ... but his days are officially numbered. They'll wait until it all blows over and then give him a ceremonial retirement."

Naw, he'll wait until Bush gets re-elected, and then forge some documents to "prove" that the Bush Administration used the PATRIOT Act, the FCC, or something to force him off the air ... big corporate media and all that in the mix as well. Dan hates Bush, and he wouldn't miss a final opportunity to smear him.


161 posted on 09/14/2004 7:26:33 AM PDT by RBroadfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

In earlier years, such as in the '60's, news organizations were not considered a profit center by the networks. The idea then was to provide information, not to sell product or to entertain. When the latter two considerations overrode the first consideration, we got what we now have with CBSNBCABCFox.


162 posted on 09/14/2004 7:26:47 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

This "genuine professionals" business is crap. If they were truly news professionals they wouldn't be in the tank for Kerry. If there are any professionals left at CBS (doubtful) they'd better start throwing the partisan hacks over the side. And by the way this garbage CBS is trying to peddle about the possibility that a 1973-era IBM Selectric, Executive, or Composer could have written these memos is BS. There is a web page you can Google by a WP expert who still owns an IBM Composer and he has tried and failed to replicate these memos. Also there is another blogger who at last count was offering $37,500 cash to anyone who can replicate these memos on circa 1973 equipment. No takers so far. Can CBS ignore these readily available facts indefinitely? Not if we don't let them!


163 posted on 09/14/2004 7:28:10 AM PDT by Big Digger (If you can keep your head when others are losing theirs, you must be a Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

I disagree: Danny was very purposeful about ignoring standard journalistic practice. It was an obvious hit piece built on obviously flawed material, with no pretense of skepticism, no background work, etc. This was, in fact, malicious.


164 posted on 09/14/2004 7:28:56 AM PDT by Nevermore (Mad as Zell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Click here for the 'tator take on the decline and fall of Dan Rather
165 posted on 09/14/2004 7:34:58 AM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
There was a time when CBS and the Associated Press were the pinnacle of the profession. Now I'm not sure what they are.

The other pinnacle!

166 posted on 09/14/2004 7:35:47 AM PDT by DrDavid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; ROCKLOBSTER; SheLion

Ok Amigos;

I've had about enough of this PC/BS from CBS!!!

This just went out to the FCC FWIW.

Whaddaya think, eh?


OPEN LETTER TO THE FCC

Sept. 14, 2004

TO: fccinfo@fcc.gov

To Whom it may concern - FCC:

To whom should I address my indignation of the blatantly politically
biased misrepresentation of "News" by CBS Television, and in particular
the indefensibly slanderous allegations about President George W. BUSH
expressed as "News" by Anchorman Dan RATHER?

Mr. RATHER's obvious political bias in his delivery style and choice of
content for his "news" programming have been offensive to me for years
(I only watch him under duress; my Wife insists of watching his 6PM
Newscast on Channel 13 here in Maine).

But his latest diatribe, using what are becoming increasingly obvious to
be forged documents to support his contentions, have far exceeded his
typicaly poor taste and journalistic incompetence.

I submit to you that I seriously consider Mr. RATHER's latest attempt to
unseat a sitting President of the United States of America by the use
of fabricated allegations of dereliction of duty during Mr. BUSH's
Military service in the Texas Air National Guard using FORGED documents
to advance his spurious allegations, during a time of national emergency
and WAR, to be sufficient to establish a reasonable suspicion of willful
sedition and TREASON against not only our President, but the concept of
Constitutional Democracy itself.

Mr. RATHER and CBS have wantonly and repeatedly violated the trust of
the American People by advancing their political agendas by use of
regular propaganda techniques under the guise of legitimate "news" over
the public broadcast media, in clear violation, I submit, of the FCC
regulations and standards of conduct by a broadcaster entrusted by their
Federal license to operate in the "Public Interest".

Please consider this as a formal request by an American Citizen (and
regular Voter) to investigate the intentions and conduct of the CBS
Television Network as well as Mr. RATHER, and take whatever regulatory
and/or legal action is deemed judicially appropriate.

Thank You;

("Uncle Jaque") etc.


167 posted on 09/14/2004 7:35:59 AM PDT by Uncle Jaque (Vigilance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Ol' Dan's deep in something, alright......but it isn't "distress".


168 posted on 09/14/2004 7:38:32 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I'm confused by some of what I've heard today," he offered, before insisting that if Rather's documents were indeed forged, it was an innocent mistake. "You're dealing with genuine professionals. The last thing in the world that any of these people would want is to phony something," he told the Times

"I didn't fall off the turnip truck yesterday," Mike added. Please....
How could somebody who's been around as long as Mike not see what a bitter, partisan hack Dan Rather is? Rather's advanced years have only made him reckless and pathetic. Whew.... What a way to go out. You would think SOMEBODY at CBS would have been watching out for Rather before things got to this point. Too late now.

169 posted on 09/14/2004 7:39:40 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This reminds me of the Lewinsky affair after Clinton denied his affair but everybody knew the truth. There is an elephant in the living room but nobody can admit they see it yet.

Rather is a condemned man.

Can't wait for the liberals' typical candlelight vigil.


BUMP

170 posted on 09/14/2004 7:40:10 AM PDT by tm22721 (In fac they)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nevermore; Big Digger
Let me make my point a little more clear.

Rather has become so blinded by his own liberalism that he has lost all ability (assuming he ever had any) to judge a story on its merits. He has been able to get away with this fatal flaw because he's been unchallenged in the past. Now with talk radio and primarily the internet this glaring deficiency in his character has come under the spotlight. Like I said before, his own prejudices have finally caught up with him.

171 posted on 09/14/2004 7:41:09 AM PDT by ladtx ( "Remember your regiment and follow your officers." Captain Charles May, 2d Dragoons, 9 May 1846)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: astounded
"My opinion is Rather is personally involved in a conspiracy to influence the outcome of the 2004 US Presidential election."

Ding! Ding! Ding!

172 posted on 09/14/2004 7:41:38 AM PDT by Sicon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Jaque

Way good letter to the FCC!


173 posted on 09/14/2004 7:43:20 AM PDT by Sal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Another network source described the atmosphere at Black Rock as one of "deep concern."

That's even worse than Dash-hole's "I am concerned, Tim."

LOL!

174 posted on 09/14/2004 7:43:39 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Free Martha Mitchell......... and Jail Teraaaaaayza)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: astounded
My opinion? Dan Rather has his back against the wall because he knows the memos are forgeries. I believe he was working with someone from the kerry campaign (Corporal Cueball, perhaps???) or the DNC (could you imagine Terry Mcauliffe, perhaps???) to damage GWB. My opinion is Rather is personally involved in a conspiracy to influence the outcome of the 2004 US Presidential election


You bet! And he was caught cold handed in the conspiracy with his pants right down!! The suspenders did NOT help him this time, either!!!
175 posted on 09/14/2004 7:44:07 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6
"I've talked to colleagues who would love to see more of a defense," he told the Times.

Is it just me, or does that line sound exactly like the RATs recent whining about how the evil Republicans were running all these negative ads and they kept telling F'n "you've got to fight back"?
176 posted on 09/14/2004 7:45:29 AM PDT by JayNorth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ
I noticed Greta had a "missing girl" story on last night.

Greta's show sucks! What a waste of time. It's an insult........Peterson, Jackson, Kobe, Peterson, Jackson ...............etc. Sickening.............

FoxNews ought to be grossed out at themselves. What a waste of air time!!!!!!!!

177 posted on 09/14/2004 7:46:01 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Free Martha Mitchell......... and Jail Teraaaaaayza)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RonF

Solid news gathering brought credibility and listener/viewer loyalty. That was the payback.


178 posted on 09/14/2004 7:49:03 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Salant in his own words: "Our job is to give people not what they want, but what WE decide they ought to have."

Better take another look at Salant.


179 posted on 09/14/2004 7:50:40 AM PDT by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

Cronkite had a unique gig at CBS. By 1968, he hated LBJ but was still a card carrying Liberal. He would have done or said just about anything to poison the well in Viet Nam.


180 posted on 09/14/2004 7:51:37 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-243 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson