Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fuzzy122

I am not sure. I am not sure if I even want him to. In essence, he would be putting his election at risk to win a longer term issue.

But that said, for all the times Rather has used the word 'Courage', this President has it. He has political courage like I have never seen before...not even Reagan had this much. Afghanistan was politically risky...Iraq was a political loser, but the right thing to do. He originally campaigned by not only touching, but grabbing the third rail of politics, SS reform. Rather may say courage a lot more often then President Bush, but President Bush has more of it than any major figure I can think of. I am not sure that he will deem it wise to do so, but if he does, you can bet President Bush has the courage to follow through.


12 posted on 09/14/2004 2:51:22 AM PDT by blanknoone ("New Media? Where is that?" Dan Rather aka Dem Blather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: blanknoone

It's not a matter of courage. It's a kind of "turn the other cheek" Christian thang. There is no need for Bush to attack Rather. People know Bush. He has faith.

And these attacks are against Bush. If Blather was attacking Cheney or H.W. Bush or anyone else he would be right in the middle of it. But defending yourself only admits that you feel vulnerable. Besides, Dubya is on offense not defense. Maybe he is too confident.

IMHO


24 posted on 09/14/2004 3:34:32 AM PDT by fuzzy122 (GBGB [God Bless George Bush] and the Armed Forces ... Arnold and Zell too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson