Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MadIvan
Then again, they may be the opportunity for Mr Kerry to fulfil the Dukakis analogy completely. It was the 1988 debates, and in particular a mind-numbingly passionless answer from the Democrat to a hypothetical question about the rape and murder of his wife, that finished him.

Then this one's in the bag. Last I heard, John Kerry doesn't answer "hypothetical questions." He said so in a softball interview with the New York Times over the weekend. No fooling.

24 posted on 09/13/2004 10:55:00 PM PDT by Prime Choice (The Log Cabin Republicans AREN'T.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Prime Choice
Last I heard, John Kerry doesn't answer "hypothetical questions." He said so in a softball interview with the New York Times over the weekend. No fooling.

Yeah, I saw Brit Hume's report on that. And the hypothetical was some version of "How will you handle Kim Jong Il," specifically what he would do in Dubya's place now that they've detonated this huge explosive. It's not as if the NYT asked how he'd handle an emergency on the starship Enterprise, they asked how he'd handle a situation he has to handle starting in January if he wins. The guy's a tool, and the debates are a perfect forum to show off just how much of a tool he is.

56 posted on 09/14/2004 7:47:36 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (If the Cambodia "lie" 100% discredits John O'Neill, what do 50 Cambodia lies do for Kerry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson