Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer
See-BS News in now forced to report accounts of NY Times and Newsweek investigating their own shoddy reporting..LMAO!!

What a comedown for the Tiffany Network, all the way down to partisan hacks.

2 posted on 09/13/2004 4:18:26 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gopwinsin04
1. CBS is acting more like a political party than a news organization interested in whether they may have gotten it wrong.

2. No provenance, no sale. Damning documents but no originals and no history.

CBS is starting to smell as putrid as their story.

5 posted on 09/13/2004 4:22:39 PM PDT by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: gopwinsin04
This was on CBS's website?!?!? Apparently, somebody didn't get the memo. And how about this?

CBS said it used several techniques to make sure the memos should be taken seriously, including talking to handwriting and document analysts and other experts who strongly insist that the documents could have been created in the 1970s.

Should be taken seriously? Could have been created in the 1970's? Not exactly a ringing endorsement from CBS News about...CBS News.

This article is just plain weird given Mr. Rather's performance tonight.

10 posted on 09/13/2004 4:23:43 PM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: gopwinsin04
This article is on the up and up... funny to see this when they just tried to deny every thing in this article on the show. I am thinking they are setting up two poor suckers to take the fall for them... saying we trusted these guys and they were wrong..

but then again.. hows come they still do if they are able to read this document they just released?

mmm..

11 posted on 09/13/2004 4:23:44 PM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: gopwinsin04
I think this is being driven by Dan Rather. I would venture to guess that Dan doesn't even know how to turn on a computer. He refuses to examine the evidence...evidence that is sure and convincing to ANYONE who will sit down and examine Microsoft Word versus type written documents. That is why it was so easy to spot in the blogosphere...we all know a skunk when we see it. Rather has a bunch of toadies who say "Yes sir" when he tells them to find evidence that it's not fake. That's why his evidence is so weak.
40 posted on 09/13/2004 4:37:11 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson