Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trentk

I was flipping the channels and hit some news panel show, only recognized one person but they were talking Memogate so I paused.

Suddenly one guy starts ranting that the question of the memo's authenticity is making it impossible for legitimate journalists to cover the *content* of the memo.

I swear it, that's what he said.

Turns out it was David Brock.

Click.


46 posted on 09/13/2004 5:34:46 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: angkor

My daughter was livid over the fact that the content is deemed important even if the docs are fake..

They've been floating the content around Texas for years with no success...so the "new documents" were created to give it gravitas..Ignore the fraud and trust us, they say!

Trust me, gang..Bush isn't an unknown running for President..He IS President and has a record to run on..Nobody cares about the content...but we do care about frauds and WHO got together to try to sabatoge the President's reelection...and perpetrate a fraud on we the people!


52 posted on 09/13/2004 5:49:01 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson