No. She was answering Brit's questions like she was on a witness stand and did not want to overstate her case as "100%", but it was in fact close enough.
Her professional opinion did not let anybody "off the hook".
Software "expert" says that you would have to go out of your way to produce the superscript "th". FALSE. In Word, with certain settigns, you have to go out of your way to keep it from happening automatically.
i hate to be on topic or anything, but rather just les loose a screed of accusations against w., had some tubby, bald-headed gut identified as "bill glennon technical consultant" who said it could all have been produced in the 1970s, and failed to answer any of the other questions. the upshot being, "they might conceivably have been possibly made we think, so we have concluded they are genuine and george bush is a bad man," or words to that effect.