Or why the Europeans do not get it...
1 posted on
09/13/2004 2:00:28 PM PDT by
Pitiricus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: Pitiricus
A weird article--I started out hating it, but ended up seeing the writer realizes some truths.
To: Pitiricus
Bush voters really do look worse (obesity is an inland disease in the US), dress worse, and are less likely to have attended a university than Kerry voters
3 posted on
09/13/2004 2:09:12 PM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
To: Pitiricus
"It is just the sort of Americans who know they are neither clever nor good-looking who will vote for Bush.""Bush supporters are the sort of American one never meets."
Oh, don't be so sure about that. Lots of us clever, good-looking Americans are met every day. I know my beautiful and brilliant wife (Phi Beta Kappa) and gorgeous children (Mensa) and I (more than 15 years of college education, degrees, faculty appointments, etc.) have been met many times--in Asia, Africa, Europe, North America, Latin America... Am I forgetting anything? The high seas.
5 posted on
09/13/2004 2:11:50 PM PDT by
Savage Beast
(The internet is the newspaper of record.)
To: Pitiricus
Love it! Got to copy and paste for two of my democrat family members. Going to red line this part~~They understand that it is hard to track down and destroy a shadowy enemy, and do not mind much if the United States has to trounce a few countries before finding the right ones.
To: Pitiricus
Im mad as hell. Is anyone listening to Sean Hannity, or previously Rush? Each newsbreak is doing the story of the weapons ban. Each report is using Kerry's own voice from his last speech, criticizing President Bush. No follow up rebuttal given from the President. Talk about giving Kerry free air time.
To: Pitiricus
Attacking President Bush for his failure to win European support for his Iraq venture may be the stupidest idea ever advanced by a major-party presidential candidate in a US election This in fact is a HUGE reason to support Bush, as "Old Europe" cannot and never has been able to decipher good from evil. Except for the art, we don't need Europe anymore.
8 posted on
09/13/2004 2:16:30 PM PDT by
Wonderama
To: Pitiricus
This fat white boy plans on voting Bush.
9 posted on
09/13/2004 2:17:25 PM PDT by
SeeRushToldU_So
(Shut up and sing. I don't care what you think.)
To: Pitiricus
Yes, such good-looking well-dressed people as James Carville, Helen Thomas, Michael Moore, Madeleine Albright, Donna Shalala, Robert Reich -- the beautiful people.
10 posted on
09/13/2004 2:17:43 PM PDT by
speedy
To: Pitiricus
"Bush voters really do look worse (obesity is an inland disease in the US), dress worse, and are less likely to have attended a university than Kerry voters."
The university part is false. People with bachelor's degrees are more likely to be Republican. People who never graduated from high school or who have graduate degrees are morely likely to be Democrats. This makes sense when you think of it this way: People with bachelor's degrees are more likely to find some success in the private sector; people with graduate degrees often teach or work for the government or are (blush)lawyers; people who don't graduate from high school like the idea of government social programs and unions.
As for looks, I'll give 'em this: I've met hot women from both parties, but at least if they tell me they're a democrat I know they'll probably be loose. So they got that going for them.
11 posted on
09/13/2004 2:18:03 PM PDT by
Hank All-American
(Free Men, Free Minds, Free Markets baby!)
To: Pitiricus
Dems better looking?? How about that ugly ass Janet "the moose" Reno?? How about that skanky Albright?? How about James "Dr. Suess" Carville?? How could you be much uglier than that??
Stupid newspapers!
John
To: Pitiricus
"Asians and Europeans meet the United States in the person of its coastal elite: ...the technological avant garde."You mean like Buckhead and the Bloggers?
"Political tourists who wish to understand the United States..."
...would be wise to pay no attention whatsoever to this article. It's full of baloney.
13 posted on
09/13/2004 2:19:51 PM PDT by
Savage Beast
(The internet is the newspaper of record.)
To: Pitiricus
I've got news for you, Spengler. The knuckle-dragging Neaderthals are the ones who're voting for Kerry.
15 posted on
09/13/2004 2:22:43 PM PDT by
Savage Beast
(The internet is the newspaper of record.)
To: Pitiricus
I think Bush is much better looking than Lurch.
To: Pitiricus
"[Bush voters] and are less likely to have attended a university than Kerry voters."
I question this one.
I read recently (in a book called The Two Majorities, which compiles a bunch of interesting demographic data on the two parties) that the average Republican voter is more likely to have a college degree than the average Democrat voter. What *is* true is that people with post-graduate degrees are more likely to vote Democrat -- and it's by a fairly wide margin, something like 70/30.
To: Pitiricus; Darkwolf377
Agreed that this is a weird article.
The passionate patriotism of ordinary Americans springs from their conviction that the American state is the shield of common folk.
Wrong! It is not the "American state," but rather the American NATION that is the shield of common folk.
The United States, by contrast, is populated by the descendants of individuals who decided to cease to be Europeans (or whatever) so that no one would be able to push them around.
BINGO! I could care less what the Europeans think, say, or vote for. The only people left there are those whose forebears lacked the gumption to emigrate to America.
Senator Kerry and the US coastal elite believe the same thing, namely that enlightened specialists can interrupt the tragic destiny of peoples and save the world from itself.
You show me an "enlightened specialist," I'll show you someone who's figuring out how to promote himself at my expense.
Attacking President Bush for his failure to win European support for his Iraq venture may be the stupidest idea ever advanced by a major-party presidential candidate in a US election.
Amen and Amen!
Once attacked, Americans want to fight back.
How did someone writing for the Asia Times pick up on this, while a major political party has dedicated itself to the denial of this concept?
After the end of the Cold War America's strategic interest in Europe withered away. As Muslim immigrants replace the infertile Europeans over time, European and US interests will diverge. It is meaningless to speak of America's "European allies" at this juncture. It is much more likely that the Europeans will become America's enemies a generation from now as Muslims emerge as a new majority.
Sobering!
20 posted on
09/13/2004 2:28:38 PM PDT by
The Great Yazoo
(Hey! Hey! J-eFing-K! How many Vets did you Diss today?)
To: Pitiricus
Someone needs to compare and contrast, Peggy Noonan, Michael Moore, Laura Ingraham, (another fat male Lib), and Ann Coulter.
21 posted on
09/13/2004 2:28:43 PM PDT by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: Pitiricus
Someone needs to compare and contrast, Peggy Noonan, Michael Moore, Laura Ingraham, (another fat male Lib), and Ann Coulter.
I forgot Arnold when he was Mr. Universe.
22 posted on
09/13/2004 2:29:45 PM PDT by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: Pitiricus
I think I speak for many of of when I say I am not fat, I am pretty decent looking, I have college education, I have a feverish love for this country, and I will most definately vote for George W. Bush. The rest of the article is pretty good though.
23 posted on
09/13/2004 2:30:18 PM PDT by
vpintheak
(Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
To: Pitiricus
"Hitler was a better dancer than Churchill; Hitler was a better dresser than Churchill; Hitler was a better painter than Churchill: he could paint a whole apartment in one afternoon, two coats."
Ya gotta love Mel Brooks, he's utterly shameless with his gag writing.
25 posted on
09/13/2004 2:33:24 PM PDT by
TalBlack
To: Pitiricus
Just looking at the conventions, the Republicans were far better looking than the Democrats. Has anyone seen a Kerry surrogate by the name of Jenny something (weird, crazed eyes, a constant interruptor and bad teeth) on FNC. The Republican surrogates look like beauty queens compared to the Democrats.
Sure, Edwards is pretty, but he is a shallow metrosexual. Lurch is a dog, and the Rat wives aren't lookers at all.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson