Posted on 09/13/2004 7:12:39 AM PDT by presidio9
I guess the Democrats on the committee felt the guy was just engaging in another wonderful lifestyle alternative. Isn't the rich tapestry of diversity a wonderful thing?
Of course if you live in San Francisco you are exempt. The mayor will decide. LOL
Oh. My. God.
yea, well I am sure there are some spouses out there ready to file a complaint! LMAO
Is Arnold Necrophobic? What does the Corpse Coalition think about this?
FYI ping.
Calling the ACLU
Sounds discriminatory to me. Why shouldn't I be able to choose a mate, necrophilee-style.
All I can think about is the the Robert Schimmel line about a guy who goes before a judge for animal necrophillia:
"Your Honor, I thought it was a alive."
Gee, next they'll tell us that you can't murder or rape in California.
What a stupid law. It's not like the corpse is going to mind.
It doesn't matter how many times you pander to the Dead-American lobby. They ALWAYS vote for Democrats.
I'm surprised that a common-sense bill like this stalled in a legislative committee last year. What could possibly be the objection?
I'm even more surprised that California didn't already have a law like this on its books.
ewwww
It is discrimination! A corpse should be able to do whatever it wants to.
Have a Twinkie even.
Long as it's not shaken.
"Who is harmed? And, while there certainly is no capability for the corpse to explicitly give consent, there is certianly no ability for the corpse to withhold consent, either. Further, once an individual has expired, so, too have that individual's rights expired. The corpse is a pile of 'unviable tissue' with no more 'rights' than a fetus.
"And as to the matter of corpses who had not achieved the 'age of consent', upon the moment of their demise, it might be technically permissible for an individual to retain the corpse for the requisite amount of time to ensure that the 'age of consent' requirements have been satisfied.
"The High Court's ruling in the above stated areas, does not presume to supercede local health codes, laws and regulations governing the disposition of dead bodies and mortal remains. And while individuals may have certain rights to carnal accommodation through the utilization of mortal remains, these rights do not presume to trump the rights of a community to regulate the important public health issues surrounding the disposition of corpses."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.