Replies

I know, I know, nothing makes any rational sense when it comes to liberal judges and the abortion slaughter they've been protecting ...
There are many well-intentioned pro-lifers who haven't arrived at your correct assessment. They remain under the false impression that the Courts are the panacea for all that ails the erstwhile virtuous society. They vest all their hope in minds that labor only to deceive, without consciences than can grieve.

I wonder, Ed, what will it take in the way of a court case coming up through the appeals process to bring the penumbral house of Roe to a summary fall? Could the Peterson appeals do it? I don't think so, not with the leftist mindset of Garagos. I'm hoping to make a really good discussion atmosphere among moderates r3egarding the notion that underpins the abortion rationale, namely 'self defense'. In the final analysis, moderate Americans aren't in favor of abortion as birth control if they learn of the aliveness of the unborn. Only the notion of self defense can keep moderates accepting the horrible 'choice'. I intend to enjoin the debate regarding/defining self-defense and raise the truth that the little ones have a right to self defense (since the women's right to abortion rests solely on the notion of self defense for continued legality), undertaken on their behalf by we who hold them dear, their fellow Americans already born and in horror over the holocaust. Technology is fast approaching which will make pregnancy termination a woman's procedure that moves the little one to an artifical womb for continued life support ... and you don't need life support for someone that's not already alive.