Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Angry with CBS? Contact info is as follows:

CBS Television Group 51 W 52nd St # 35 New York, NY 10019 (212) 975-4321

CBS News FAX is (212) 975-1998 (Print out Hugh's list of flaws with the documents and fax them.)

60 Minutes Spokesperson: Kelli Edwards 212-975-6795

CBS News Comments 212-975-3248. (Leave a comment on the answering machine)

60 Minutes 524 West 57th Street New York, NY 10019 212- 975-3247 CALL AND COMPLAIN!

60II@cbsnews.com

1 posted on 09/12/2004 9:39:46 AM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: Checkers

Never mind any of this...Don't you know Kerry was in Vietnam?


2 posted on 09/12/2004 9:41:35 AM PDT by Drango (What's the Font, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

not done yet..

At least one letter is addressed to the wrong address, It is addressed to Bush's address at sign up and not his (then) current address which was known to the ANG at the time.


3 posted on 09/12/2004 9:43:31 AM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

Contact Dan's bosses:

Sumner M. Redstone, chairman/CEO - Viacom

sumner.redstone@viacom.com

Leslie Moonves, president/CEO, CBS -

leslie.moonves@tvc.cbs.com

File a complaint with the FCC:

fccinfo@fcc.gov


5 posted on 09/12/2004 9:46:55 AM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Bump mark


6 posted on 09/12/2004 9:47:48 AM PDT by listenhillary (We are defending the peace by taking the fight to the enemy.GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers; JohnHuang2; RonDog; doug from upland; dueler88
But, Dan stands behind his story and that's what's important. The overwhelming evidence of fraud is not nearly as significant as the series nature of the charge. And that's hugh!

Dan stands behind his story...behind history. Yep that's where he belongs; on the excrement end of history.

This one's deep, Dan. Its really Deep. Swallow hard so you don't choke it.

Keep Hammering, Hugh!

Atos

8 posted on 09/12/2004 9:49:44 AM PDT by Mr.Atos (http://mysandmen.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

CBS will not deny that the DNC or the Kerry Campaign are the source of these forgeries.


10 posted on 09/12/2004 9:51:18 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ("And oftentimes, to win us to our harm, the instruments of darkness tell us truths")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

AH I love Hugh he always is to the point and does yeoman work for us all


11 posted on 09/12/2004 9:51:30 AM PDT by jnarcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

Mr. Hewitt's list of technical deficiencies is incomplete.

* Typewriters in 72/3 didn't have variable line spacing.

* Typewriters in 72/3 didn't have automatic word wrap (the bell rang and people either hyphenated or completed the word).


12 posted on 09/12/2004 9:51:57 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers
Dan Rather has not appeared opposite a serious journalist to answer extended questions on camera, even though his reputation and the reputation of his network are being shredded and a confidant witness would demand a hearing with a Russert or a Hume.

Excellent point, if he's telling the truth, he'd be demanding to be all over sunday morning talk shows to 'prove' his story....

17 posted on 09/12/2004 9:58:21 AM PDT by JPJones ("We'll cross all our tee's and dot all our.....lower case j's")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

bookmark


19 posted on 09/12/2004 10:00:10 AM PDT by federal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

After seeing the PDF form of the memos, I noticed two items not in this list:

1) According to family members, Killian was a poor typist. Why aren't there typing errors in the documents, especially those that are "memos to file"?

2) I would expect some spelling errors in the documents. I didn't notice any. Why wouldn't there be some, especially again in the "memos to file"? It appears as though a spell checker was used on these documents.


20 posted on 09/12/2004 10:00:50 AM PDT by Craig Shelley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

Is there a freeper out there who routinely handles document production and impeachment in a court of law? I'm a lawyer and have had some experience with it but I don't have much experience with jury trials and none with criminal procedure so don't know whether these memos could be admitted. Clearly, they're hearsay first of all but might be admissable under the business records exception but the best evidence rule would require an original, especially where the possibility of forgery exists. If it can be established that these are forgeries, then someone has committed fraud. Fraud seems to be to trump the journalistic ethic against revealing sources.


21 posted on 09/12/2004 10:04:41 AM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

What amazes me is that it is CBS's responsibility to prove it's case.


The debate MUST switch to CBS's proving its contention is accurate OR it becomes a just a matter of interpretation.

But since they are making the charge, it is CBS's duty to either prove it's case or withdraw the charge.

When will the media and the RNC make this point?

The entire debate hangs on this distinction.
23 posted on 09/12/2004 10:14:46 AM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

I've sent the emails to Redstone and Moonves, and a follow-up to my earlier email to the FCC.

We should make these people understand that this criminal scandal won't die.


24 posted on 09/12/2004 10:14:52 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

I think an investigation is in order with regards to Dan Rather's daughter, Robin. She and Barnes are high ranking members of the DNC.


25 posted on 09/12/2004 10:23:38 AM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers
Perhaps it's there and I missed it, but one more that I found especially convincing - typewriters don't keep a tight baseline. Some of the characters will tend to be a bit high, and some a bit low.
26 posted on 09/12/2004 10:23:53 AM PDT by ThePythonicCow (I was humble, before I was born. -- J Frondeur Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

But, but, but Blather stands behind the docs...
Like that senile old fool would know a genuine Navy document from a jar of Peter Pan peanut butter! ROFLMAO


Clinotoon lied, Kerry lied, Blather lied and the whole world knows it!

NEXT CASE!


27 posted on 09/12/2004 10:26:26 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

I already emailed Les Moonves. I'm eagerly awaiting a reply.


28 posted on 09/12/2004 10:26:37 AM PDT by Ciexyz ("FR, best viewed with a budgie on hand".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers
What Dan will be wearing when he finally gets the story right.

(Thanks to Michael Pollard)


30 posted on 09/12/2004 10:28:41 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Use in a well ventilated area)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

It's Bush's fault.


32 posted on 09/12/2004 10:33:25 AM PDT by Give Piece A Chance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson