(Thanks to Michael Pollard)
CBS Television Group 51 W 52nd St # 35 New York, NY 10019 (212) 975-4321
CBS News FAX is (212) 975-1998 (Print out Hugh's list of flaws with the documents and fax them.)
60 Minutes Spokesperson: Kelli Edwards 212-975-6795
CBS News Comments 212-975-3248. (Leave a comment on the answering machine)
60 Minutes 524 West 57th Street New York, NY 10019 212- 975-3247 CALL AND COMPLAIN!
60II@cbsnews.com
Never mind any of this...Don't you know Kerry was in Vietnam?
not done yet..
At least one letter is addressed to the wrong address, It is addressed to Bush's address at sign up and not his (then) current address which was known to the ANG at the time.
Contact Dan's bosses:
Sumner M. Redstone, chairman/CEO - Viacom
sumner.redstone@viacom.com
Leslie Moonves, president/CEO, CBS -
leslie.moonves@tvc.cbs.com
File a complaint with the FCC:
fccinfo@fcc.gov
Bump mark
Dan stands behind his story...behind history. Yep that's where he belongs; on the excrement end of history.
This one's deep, Dan. Its really Deep. Swallow hard so you don't choke it.
Keep Hammering, Hugh!
Atos
CBS will not deny that the DNC or the Kerry Campaign are the source of these forgeries.
AH I love Hugh he always is to the point and does yeoman work for us all
Mr. Hewitt's list of technical deficiencies is incomplete.
* Typewriters in 72/3 didn't have variable line spacing.
* Typewriters in 72/3 didn't have automatic word wrap (the bell rang and people either hyphenated or completed the word).
Excellent point, if he's telling the truth, he'd be demanding to be all over sunday morning talk shows to 'prove' his story....
bookmark
After seeing the PDF form of the memos, I noticed two items not in this list:
1) According to family members, Killian was a poor typist. Why aren't there typing errors in the documents, especially those that are "memos to file"?
2) I would expect some spelling errors in the documents. I didn't notice any. Why wouldn't there be some, especially again in the "memos to file"? It appears as though a spell checker was used on these documents.
Is there a freeper out there who routinely handles document production and impeachment in a court of law? I'm a lawyer and have had some experience with it but I don't have much experience with jury trials and none with criminal procedure so don't know whether these memos could be admitted. Clearly, they're hearsay first of all but might be admissable under the business records exception but the best evidence rule would require an original, especially where the possibility of forgery exists. If it can be established that these are forgeries, then someone has committed fraud. Fraud seems to be to trump the journalistic ethic against revealing sources.
I've sent the emails to Redstone and Moonves, and a follow-up to my earlier email to the FCC.
We should make these people understand that this criminal scandal won't die.
I think an investigation is in order with regards to Dan Rather's daughter, Robin. She and Barnes are high ranking members of the DNC.
But, but, but Blather stands behind the docs...
Like that senile old fool would know a genuine Navy document from a jar of Peter Pan peanut butter! ROFLMAO
Clinotoon lied, Kerry lied, Blather lied and the whole world knows it!
NEXT CASE!
I already emailed Les Moonves. I'm eagerly awaiting a reply.
(Thanks to Michael Pollard)
It's Bush's fault.