Posted on 09/11/2004 2:27:50 PM PDT by nwrep
Here's another favorite quote from this old-time "liberal":
"Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very carefully used, and that definite safety rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced. But the right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible"
Senator Hubert H. Humphrey (D) Minn.
"Know Your Lawmakers" Guns (magazine), February, 1960, p. 4.
He was right ... However the communist party he was referring to now uses the "jackass" as it's logo
Here's another one:
The liberals of the 1960s who led the fight for civil rights laws opposed affirmative action quotas then. The legislative history of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, especially its famous section 703(j), is clear: it was intended to prohibit reverse discrimination and quotas. The Senate floor leader for the Civil Rights Act, Hubert Humphrey, declared that Title VII "would prohibit preferential treatment for any particular group," adding famously that if this proved not the case, he would eat the pages of the statute book where the Act appeared. "Do you want a society that is nothing but an endless power struggle among organized groups?" Humphrey asked. "Do you want a society where there is no place for the individual? I dont."
http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/oped/hayward/97/affact.html
Rope-a-dope.
My big bruddah was canvassing for Goldwater in '64. I remember him talking about that stuff.
Clinton is on record as supporting the 2nd; so's Flipper. Talk is cheep.
But HHH, unlike all of them, unlike most Republicans, and even unlike the NRA, understood that it was about an armed populace preventing tyranny, not hunting and target shooting.
You wouldn't even be able to get Bush to support Humphrey's view.
The Dems voted the bill down -- it would mean the loss of too many of their voters.
Isn't it wonderful when you can get Congress to give you a legal monopoly. After that the Democrats had no competition.
Then, had he been alive last month, he would've been on right after Zell?
They outlawed the communist party and renamed it Democrat party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.