Skip to comments.
U.S. agrees to abide by NAFTA panel decision on Canadian softwood
Global News ^
| 10-Sep-2004
| Canadian Press
Posted on 09/11/2004 9:39:16 AM PDT by drtom
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
This is the third time in the past 10 years and each time the Canadians won.
1
posted on
09/11/2004 9:39:17 AM PDT
by
drtom
To: NorthOf45; albertabound; kanawa; Snowyman
2
posted on
09/11/2004 9:41:18 AM PDT
by
drtom
To: drtom
Are Americans filing any cases? Give these bastards a taste of their own medicine. Go after Airbus for starters.
The economic war against America continues. It won't stop until we start fighting back.
3
posted on
09/11/2004 10:27:51 AM PDT
by
Finalapproach29er
({about the news media} "We'll tell you any sh** you want hear" : Howard Beale --> NETWORK)
To: Finalapproach29er
'The economic war against America continues. It won't stop until we start fighting back.' It's not an "economic war" ... it's business.
4
posted on
09/11/2004 10:35:06 AM PDT
by
NorthOf45
To: NorthOf45
Not when its coordinated in the EU.
I can't believe we haven't pulled out of this anti-American group. When you're the most powerful nation on Earth, you don't forfeit that power to a council of washed-up American hating bureaucrats.
When it comes to bisiness, America has no friends. Everybody wants to see the giant fall down.
5
posted on
09/11/2004 10:49:10 AM PDT
by
Finalapproach29er
({about the news media} "We'll tell you any sh** you want hear" : Howard Beale --> NETWORK)
To: Finalapproach29er
I guess the fact that American lunber prices will now drop is a bad thing from your warped perspective. Us bastards are linked at the hip economically. This resolution is good for both countries and will definately ease some of the tensions.
6
posted on
09/11/2004 10:50:27 AM PDT
by
albertabound
(It's good to beeeeee Alberta bound)
To: drtom
It's one thing to give up sovereignty to from a union of states like this country did a couple hundred years ago. But to give up sovereignty through treaty in the hope of gaining international market share and living up to an ideology is just silly, maybe even suicidal.
7
posted on
09/11/2004 10:54:02 AM PDT
by
sixmil
To: drtom
American lumber producers have long contended Canadian imports are subsidized by low Crown timber-cutting fees, known as stumpage, and other provincial forestry policies. How is it that the Canadian eco-terrorists let them get away with this?
8
posted on
09/11/2004 11:11:33 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
To: Finalapproach29er
But the lumber issue wasn't coordinated in the EU. It's a trade dispute with our most important business partner north of the border. It was started by US lumber barons making a claim and lobbying the DoC to impose countervailing duties.
9
posted on
09/11/2004 11:37:15 AM PDT
by
drtom
To: Moonman62
There have been substantial activities. During the leftist NDP rule in BC stumpage fees went up significantly and the forestry practice code was revised (read: screwed up) in a manner that it drove a lot of mills out of business. In general though, eco-activities are concentrated around the BC coastal rainforests while logging, of course, takes place throughout the province(s).
Weyerhaeuser, Interfor and other large players have started to work together with some environmental groups after boycotts of their lumber in the EU started to cut into their margins.
My company operates on both sides of the border and if you compare the operations of medium-sized US and Canadian mills, the latter are usually much more efficient due to constant re-investment in technology. This is also one of the reasons why a lot of mills survived the extra duties for such a long time.
10
posted on
09/11/2004 11:46:22 AM PDT
by
drtom
To: albertabound
Your concern for American consumers is touching.
11
posted on
09/11/2004 1:29:05 PM PDT
by
Finalapproach29er
({about the news media} "We'll tell you any sh** you want hear" : Howard Beale --> NETWORK)
To: Finalapproach29er
12
posted on
09/11/2004 1:33:04 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: drtom
I know. But its part of a bigger problem we face; these extraconstitutional global bodies who are knee-jerk America haters.
There is a coordinated assault to open up America, but these hypocritical bastards aren't being counter-sued by America for doing the same damn things (EU-agriculture,airbus,etc.) They subsidize worse than the US, yet all the decisions are going against the US.
I'm riled up about that. No justice,no peace!
13
posted on
09/11/2004 1:34:25 PM PDT
by
Finalapproach29er
({about the news media} "We'll tell you any sh** you want hear" : Howard Beale --> NETWORK)
To: drtom
NAFTA needs to go the way of the DODO bird.
This was a very bad idea to begin with and it's becoming a worse idea as it grows older.
14
posted on
09/11/2004 1:34:29 PM PDT
by
Leatherneck_MT
(Goodnight Chesty, wherever you may be.)
To: Leatherneck_MT
Yeah, we can make-up the $300 billion of exports elsewhere. Pocket change.
15
posted on
09/11/2004 1:41:56 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
We did just fine in Trade long before NAFTA existed we will do fine long after NAFTA expires.
16
posted on
09/11/2004 1:44:10 PM PDT
by
Leatherneck_MT
(Goodnight Chesty, wherever you may be.)
To: 1rudeboy
Have we (in the USA) won even 5 cases during the existence of the WTO?
Just curious.
17
posted on
09/11/2004 1:45:34 PM PDT
by
Finalapproach29er
({about the news media} "We'll tell you any sh** you want hear" : Howard Beale --> NETWORK)
To: Finalapproach29er
. . . yet all the decisions are going against the US. Ten replies earlier, you admitted that you didn't know. What happened?
18
posted on
09/11/2004 1:45:58 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: Finalapproach29er
Please see my #12 if you are truly curious. Education is a good thing.
19
posted on
09/11/2004 1:47:43 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: drtom
I hope that the lumber duties are removed, I'm building a house and the lumber duty amounts to a 37% surcharge. That's a huge amount in the cost of the house. No one expects these charges to be removed before the end of the year, however.
20
posted on
09/11/2004 1:52:02 PM PDT
by
Eva
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson