Replies

Re: #25
I haven't seen anyone reply to you and I too have wondered about this matter. Where are the originals? Why are there even Xerox copies? Why would some obscure joker copy a few obscure papers and have them available for a secret pass off to CBS? Why aren't there more copies of obscure papers that would support the fours Xerox memos? Why can't we answer these questions?

The problem is that this vital information is being closely held. The derivative speculation about why it's closely held serves CBS in some way. Why is that? Who could know? Asking questions about CBS may lead to answers you don't like . . . and so forth. This helps CBS but why does it do that?

My reaction to all this is something like the movie character General Buck Turgison in "Strangelove", "I smell a big fat commie rat!"

The jerks at CBS are jerking us around but they seem to have a monopoly on the inside info. I speculate that if any part of it really helped them, they would have disclosed it by now. Also, holding it back, especially to CBS' peers, gets unprofessional fast. When you're serving truth and virtue (if CBS does such a thing) but cause your MSM peers to waste great efforts and expense because you're deceptively coy about provenance, it causes hard feelings. "We at CBS wanted to look dishonest for a while so you could waste your time." I doubt that people involved in a serious profession can get away with that in public.

It seems like an excellent bet that CBS is actually dishonest and its' source is important for partisans to hide. The reality is that copies suck and are bad evidence. Handwriting analysis is stupid on copies. Why CBS thinks that the "nth" generation copy excuse is useful is truly pathetic. It does cause them problems when we rightly ask, "Why don't you have the original and why didn't you release the best copy and explain why it got copied and the original got destroyed?" This matters when they say that experts validate the CBS position.