Replies

This flight is still in the air. Don't know if this has already been posted, but my radar is a little sensitive, today being 10/12 and all...

http://www.trackingterrorism.com/Default.asp?dismode=article&artid=420

"Bomb Threat to Chicago Bound Plane
Source: Associated Press | 9:32:21 AM EST

AMSTERDAM, Netherlands -- A Dutch broadcaster said Tuesday it received an e-mail claiming a bomb was on a plane from Amsterdam to Chicago, but authorities determined no emergency landing was necessary and police were investigating the threat.

Flight SK3909, a Scandinavian Airlines flight operated by United Airlines, with 117 passengers and a crew of 11 aboard, was expected to land in Chicago at 1:22 p.m. CDT (2:22 p.m. EDT), United spokeswoman Robin Urbanski said.

"It's being dealt with by authorities and we are cooperating fully," Urbanski said.

United received the report of the e-mail threat about one hour and 45 minutes into the flight, she said, adding that the airline was in contact with the plane's crew.

Authorities decided after "an initial analysis" not to ask the pilots to make an emergency landing or change their schedule, Dutch national police spokesman Bart Coppens said.

The broadcaster, RTV Noord-Holland, said the e-mail appeared to have been sent from an address in Germany, and it had notified police.

In September and October, false bomb threats have forced at least half a dozen flights to make emergency landings in Europe.

The Sept. 26 diversion of an Athens-to-New York Olympic Airlines flight to London under military jets' escort was the first of a flurry of threat-related emergency landings around Europe.

Others have included two more Olympic Airlines flights, a Frankfurt, Germany-to-New York Singapore Airlines plane, a Lufthansa flight to Tel Aviv, and a Berlin-to-London British Airways jet. The Lufthansa and British Airways planes landed with military escorts.

Also, a Frankfurt-to-Chicago United Airlines flight that landed in London because of mechanical problems was later unable to take off because of a security threat.

In none of the cases was a bomb found on board.

Besides alarming passengers and tangling schedules, the threats are costly to airlines, which in some cases must dump fuel, put up passengers at hotels, and pay fees to airports for landing and servicing related to a diversion."