Posted on 09/10/2004 9:55:57 PM PDT by Catphish
. . . Though the question has hardly been conclusively answered, the consensus of opinion among interested parties seems to be that neither an Executive nor a Selectric could have produced these memos.
My purpose here is not to debate the relative merits of either of those typewriters; that discussion is happening elsewhere. Rather, I want to take a moment to consider the dark horse candidate, the one piece of equipment that is widely believed to have been capable of producing a document similar to these memos, but that has been dismissed as being so improbable an alternative as to hardly bear talking about.
I'm referring to the IBM Selectric Composer. This machine resembles a sophisticated electric typewriter in most respects, but is in fact a full-fledged cold-type typesetting machine. (Cold type as opposed to hot type, machines like the Linotype that would cast entire lines of type in molten lead as the typesetter worked. Ah, those were the days.)
Whenever the topic has turned to the Selectric Composer, it has been dismissed out-of-hand as being far too expensive an item to find in an office on an Air National Guard base: The machine sold for anywhere from $3,600 to $4,400, and fonts were extra and not cheap. Furthermore, the Composer was widely agreed to be far too complicated and slow a machine to use for typing up memoranda, especially ones that were destined to go into a file and not even be distributed.
But the nagging question remained: Could an IBM Selectric Composer have been used to produce these documents?
(Excerpt) Read more at shapeofdays.typepad.com ...
Man, that middle signature looks like JFK
Good find.
>>>Could an IBM Selectric Composer have been used to produce these documents?
In theory, yes.
But the likelyhood of the TxANG having one to use to type memos to file is somewhere near the chances of me dating Ann Coulter.
How much did one of those puppies cost and could someone that did not type use one?
And remember this was in 1973 dollars.
Someone posted an article that the font, Times New Roman, was not even copyrighted until the 80's.
If this was a civil court case, CBS would be settling.
Yes, I found this site very interesting when I was just there looking at the articles. Very detailed analysis on how the IBM Selectric could probably NOT have been used to create the CBS documents. Also nice visual comparison of the varied CBS 'Killian' signatures vs the standard 'Killian' signatures on the genuine Bush documents.
OK, that lays the IBM Composer issue to rest. The documents could not have been produced on one.
Finito.
That's what I thought. I would bet my 401K that TANG had access to that machine.
Or you could just use Microsoft Word and produce a document that perfectly aligns with the CBS memo in a matter of minutes. . .
FYI, Corvettes went for 5,500 in 1973.
I would bet my 401K that TANG had access to that machine."
So what are you suggesting here?
but rather on the twip level (1/1440th of an inch or 1/20th of a point).
I think we know who's on the twip level right now.
And it's kerned in a way only one item kerns: The current Windows version of Microsoft Word. Even the Mac version of Word would produce a slightly different document if the same words were typed into it.
The overlay of the MS Word documents over the CBS documents means case closed. There can be no other possibility.
Dang I meant to say "did not".
Normally if you creating a CYA memo you making a paper trail or diary to put you concerns down about something in case your ever called on it...normally there hand written or notes in a journal
BUMP
I thought as much, but I wanted to hear it from you.
AND my understanding is that that would be using the default Word settings. In other words, you don't have to play around with Word to get it to make the CBS memos, you simply type it out and print.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.