Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eclectic

In my experience it's never that small. You tend to really notice it with vowels, *especially the letter "e" (uppercase or lowercase). When you have lines of text, the error tends to become skewed by the commonly used letters (T, S, R, L, and E). I've *seen* it in trying to reproduce fonts. It's extremely difficult work, not something the Monotype could have done by accident when creating the font in our word processors. Also, as I mentioned in my previous argment, typewriters would have varied a little bit, maybe only in fractions of a point, but the effect would have been visible. Monotype would have had to base the curent MSWord font on this particular typewriter and font ball. Another one would have given them different character spacings.


171 posted on 09/11/2004 1:24:04 AM PDT by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: Windcatcher

Letter frequences is a strong point (there must be a systemic difference then). I have to conceede you win the argument :-)


172 posted on 09/11/2004 1:42:22 AM PDT by eclectic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson