Also a retired colonel was on Special Report this evening and he brought with him documents from the period in question and claims they had to be typed literally on the same machine. He claims the typeface is completely different.
Posted on 09/10/2004 6:17:59 PM PDT by kcinnh
CBS is the fake!
grrrrrr!!! I've been working on this research for TWO HOURS!!!!
YOU BUMS, YOU BEAT ME TO IT!!!
BUT, I PROVIDED THE PROOF THAT HE VIOLATED HIS ETHICS RULES, **AND** THAT HE VIOLATED HIS OWN PUBLISHED STANDARDS :)
Know how I know about all of this kind of stuff?? I've STOMPED EXPERTS IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS BEFORE!!
the CBS documents were made with MS Word end of story.
Also a retired colonel was on Special Report this evening and he brought with him documents from the period in question and claims they had to be typed literally on the same machine. He claims the typeface is completely different.
A "handwriting expert" for a typewritten "memo"? HUNH?
Keep Working! It's all good....
`Does anyone have any informaation on Robert Strong?
(1) They're hanging their entire defense on a handwriting expert
(2) They've admitted they DON'T HAVE THE ORIGINALS.
Just to be explicit: the testimony of a handwriting expert that the signature looks legit on a COPY of something doesn't mean JACK SQUAT. For crying out loud I could go to the White House website, look around, mess around with cut 'n paste, and produce a (COPY of) a "memo" signed by George W. Bush, and the signature would be entirely legit. (It REALLY WOULD be a copy of Bush's signature.)
Like you said: how stupid do they think we are?
Hey, makes perfect sense to me.
One thing that no one has answered...is where did these documents come from. CBS says that they are original. If so, then they were stolen from the National Guard files. Remember, records created on an organizations time, using an organization equipment belongs to the organization. This means that someone has committed a FELONY -- Theft of Government Records!
(1) They're hanging their entire defense on a handwriting expert
(2) They've admitted they DON'T HAVE THE ORIGINALS.
Just to be explicit: the testimony of a handwriting expert that the signature looks legit on a COPY of something doesn't mean JACK SQUAT. For crying out loud I could go to the White House website, look around, mess around with cut 'n paste, and produce a (COPY of) a "memo" signed by George W. Bush, and the signature would be entirely legit. (It REALLY WOULD be a copy of Bush's signature.)
Like you said: how stupid do they think we are?
The DUms have backup, Madame Cleo also says the memos are real.
Anyone know anything about this "Robert Strong" that confirms the documents? He apparently worked with Killian, according to Blather.
Matley is the same clown who verified the VINCE FOSTER SUICIDE NOTE against a wall of experts who said they were forged.
Could this punk be in someone's pocket at the DNC?
I am still looking for the "memo" concerning Bush, it has a fax number on it. I would like to see who faxed it to Danny Boy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.