Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mike Fieschko

My point was that if they don't have the originals, their own expert had previously admitted that you cannot confirm a document is authentic.

So the question is, DID CBS HAVE ORIGINALS< OR COPIES??


13 posted on 09/10/2004 4:39:01 PM PDT by Boxcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Boxcar
So the question is, DID CBS HAVE ORIGINALS< OR COPIES??

The transcript has been posted. I searched for 'cop' and 'orig', but had NO hits.

TRANSCRIPT OF RATHER REPORT [09/10 07:03 PM]
14 posted on 09/10/2004 4:45:11 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko (Oh, and Dick Cheney too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Boxcar
So the question is, DID CBS HAVE ORIGINALS< OR COPIES??

CBS fabricated the documents on a word processor, that's clear.

What's not clear is the source of the information in the documents. Rather apparantly believes the information once existed, or describes real events.

If the forgery can ever be proven, they will use a Tawana Brawley variant defense, that they had to forge the documents to show on air for visual purposes, but that the events really happened, or might have happened, or if they didn't that 1LT Bush did other bad things.

21 posted on 09/11/2004 3:41:11 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Hillary becomes the RAT candidate on October 9. You saw it here first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson