To: Petronski
OK, thanks, buddy...
BUT...to the point...NOBODY on earth could have used whatever version of Times New Roman in the 70's unless they had a damned Linotype printer used exclusively in the printing industry!
Do I have that right?
To: Airborne Longhorn
That is my understanding. I am as much an expert on this as Marcel wassizname on SeeBS.
929 posted on
09/10/2004 4:47:59 PM PDT by
Petronski
(I'd like to volunteer to build a barn and take you press guys out behind it and kick your asses.)
To: Airborne Longhorn
There were also optical typesetting machines that would create letters photographically and could print a page of typeset material using a silver stat process. Those machines cost $20,000 and were seriously hard to learn to use.
930 posted on
09/10/2004 4:48:16 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
To: Airborne Longhorn
"BUT...to the point...NOBODY on earth could have used whatever version of Times New Roman in the 70's unless they had a damned Linotype printer used exclusively in the printing industry!
Do I have that right?
A buddy of mine was in the printing industry back in the 70's and early 80's.... He's also a dyed in the wool democrat (albeit with some conservative traits - he doesn't drink the DIM cool aid...)
His opinion of this entire situation? The CBS documents are frauds. Plain and simple.
He also said that this situation has pushed him over the edge. He _was_ going to skip the election this year - he just couldn't bring himself to vote for Kerry. Now, however, he's decided to cast his vote for President Bush!
By the way, we live in New York State...
943 posted on
09/10/2004 4:53:08 PM PDT by
Skywarner
(Enjoying freedom? Thank a Veteran!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson