Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live Thread: CBS Evening News (Dan tells us why we're all wrong)
www.freerepublic.com | September 10, 2004

Posted on 09/10/2004 3:18:38 PM PDT by Howlin

Edited on 09/10/2004 4:53:58 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Have at it.

******Transcript************



'KEY CHALLENGES TO NATIONAL GUARD DOCUMENTS ANSWERED'
Fri Sep 10 2004 19:03:11 ET

The biggest challenges to the authenticity of the documents featured in the 60 MINUTES segment on President Bush's Texas National Guard service are answered in a report to be broadcast on the CBS EVENING NEWS tonight (6:30-7:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network. The report states that the type style, typewriter and the superscript function critics claim did not exist at the time the memos from President Bush's former Texas National Guard commander were typed were indeed all available. In fact, similar raised "th" superscripts have been found on other National Guard documents the White House has released from the president's file.

Furthermore, Marcel Mately, the document and handwriting expert used to authenticate the documents for CBS News and 60 MINUTES, asserts that copies of the memos critics are examining have been degraded by reproduction though photocopying, computer scanning and faxing and are not reliable representations of the memos.

A transcript is attached:

BUSH DOCUMENTS

EVENING NEWS WITH DAN RATHER

9-10-04

Rather Lead In: There were attacks today on the CBS News "60 Minutes" report this week raising new questions about President Bush's Vietnam-era time in the Texas Air National Guard. The questions raised by our report include:

--Did a wealthy Texas oilman-friend of the Bush family use his influence with the speaker of the Texas House of Representatives .. to get George W. Bush a coveted slot in the National Guard .. keeping him out of the draft and any probable service IN Vietnam?

--Did Lieutenant Bush refuse a direct order from his commanding officer?

--Was Lieutenant. Bush suspended for failure to perform up to standards?

--Did Lieutenant Bush ever take a physical he was required and ordered to take? If not, why not?

--And did Lieutenant Bush, in fact, complete his commitment to the Guard?

These questions grew out of new witnesses and new evidence -- including documents written by Lieutenant Bush's squadron commander.

Today, on the internet and elsewhere, some people -- including many who are partisan political operatives -- concentrated not on the key questions the overall story raised but on the documents that were part of the support of the story.

They alleged the documents are FAKE.

Rather: MANY OF THOSE RAISING QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CBS DOCUMENTS HAVE FOCUSED ON SOMETHING CALLED SUPERSCRIPT... A KEY THAT AUTOMATICALLY TYPES A RAISED "TH". CRITICS CLAIM TYPEWRITERS DIDN'T HAVE THAT ABILITY IN THE 70S. BUT SOME MODELS DID....IN FACT, OTHER BUSH MILITARY RECORDS ALREADY OFFICIALLY RELEASED BY THE WHITE HOUSE ITSELF SHOW THE SAME SUPERSCRIPT.

HERE'S ONE..... FROM 1968.

SOME ANALYSTS OUTSIDE CBS SAY THEY BELIEVE THE TYPEFACE ON THESE MEMOS IS NEW TIMES ROMAN.... WHICH THEY CLAIM WAS NOT AVAILABLE IN THE 1970S.

BUT THE OWNER OF THE COMPANY THAT DISTRIBUTES THIS TYPING STYLE.... SAYS IT HAS BEEN AVAILABE SINCE 1931. DOCUMENT AND HANDWRITING EXAMINER MARCEL MATLEY ANALYZED THE DOCUMENTS FOR CBS NEWS.

HE SAYS HE BELIEVES THEY ARE REAL...BUT IS CONCERNED ABOUT EXACTLY WHAT IS BEING EXAMINED BY SOME OF THE PEOPLE QUESTIONING THE DOCUMENTS....BECAUSE DETIORATION OCCURS EACH TIME A DOCUMENT IS REPRODUCED.....AND THE DOCUMENTS BEING ANALYZED OUTSIDE OF CBS HAVEBEEN PHOTOCOPIED, FAXED, SCANNED AND DOWNLOADED.... AND ARE FAR REMOVED FROM THE DOCUMENTS CBS STARTED WITH WHICH WERE ALSO PHOTOCOPIES.

DOCUMENT AND HANDWRITING EXAMINER MARCEL MATLEY DID THIS INTERVIEW WITH US PRIOR TO THE 60 MINUTES BROADCAST.

HE LOOKED AT THE DOCUMENTS AND THE SIGNATURES OF COLONEL JERRY KILLIAN.... COMPARING KNOWN DOCUMENTS WITH THE COLONEL'S SIGNATURE ON THE NEWSLY DISCOVERED ONES.

Matley: "WE LOOK BASICALLY AT WHAT'S CALLED SIGNIFICANT OR INSIGNIFICANT FEATURES TO DETERMINE WHETHER IT'S THE SAME PERSON OR NOT. I HAVE NO PROBLEM IDENTIFYING THEM.

I WOULD SAY BASED ON OUR AVAILABLE HANDWRITING EVIDENCE, YES. THIS IS THE SAME PERSON."

Rather: MATLEY FINDS THE SIGNAT'URES TO BE SOME OF THE MOST COMPELLING EVIDENCE...WE TALKED TO HIM AGAIN TODAY BY SATELLITE.

Matley "SINCE IT IS REPRESENTED THAT SOME OF THEM ARE DEFINITELY HIS... THEN WE CAN CONCLUDE THEY ARE HIS SIGNATURES."

Rather: "ARE YOU SURPRISED THAT QUESTIONS COME ABOUT THESE. WE'RE NOT, BUT I WAS WONDERING IF YOU'RE SURPRISED."

Matley: "I KNEW GOING IN THAT THIS WAS DYNAMITE ONE WAY OR THE OTHER AND I KNEW THAT POTENTIALLY IT WAS FAR MORE POTENTIAL DAMAGE TO ME PROFESSIONALLY THAN BENEFIT ME. AND I KNEW THAT. BUT WE SEEK THE TRUTH. THAT'S WHAT WE DO. YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO PUT YOURSELF OUT. TO SEEK THE TRUTH AND TAKE WHAT COMES FROM IT."

Rather: ROBERT STRONG WAS AN ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FOR THE TEXAS AIR NATIONAL GUARD DURING THE VIETNAM YEARS. HE KNEW COL. JERRY KILLIAN, THE MAN CREDITED WITH WRITING THE DOCUMENTS.... AND PAPER WORK... LIKE THESE DOCUMENTS...WAS HIS SPECIALTY. HE IS STANDING BY HIS JUDGEMENT THAT THE DOCUMENTS ARE REAL.

Rather: "WHEN YOU READ THROUGH THESE DOCUMENTS, IS THERE ANY DOUBT IN YOUR MIND THAT THESE ARE GENUINE?"

Strong: "WELL,, THEY ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE WAY BUSINESS WAS DONE AT THAT TIME. THEY ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE MAN THAT I REMEMBER JERRY KILLIAN BEING. I DON'T SEE ANYTHING IN THE DOCUMENTS THAT'S DISCORDANT WITH WHAT WERE THE TIMES, WHAT WERE THE SITUATION OR WHAT WERE THE PEOPLE INVOLVED."

Rather: STRONG SAYS THE HIGHLY CHARGED POLITICAL ATMOSPHERE OF THE GUARD AT THE TIME... WAS PERFECTLY REPRESENTED IN THE NEW DOCUMENTS

Strong: "IT VERGED ON OUTRIGHT CORRUPTION IN TERMS OF THE FAVORS THAT WERE DONE, THE POWER THAT WAS TRADED. AND IT WAS UNCONSCIONABLE. FROM A MORAL AND ETHICAL STANDPOINT. IT WAS UNCONSCIONABLE."

Rather: IT IS THE INFORMATION IN THE NEW DOCUMENTS THAT IS MOST COMPELLING FOR PEOPLE FAMILIAR WITH PRESIDENT BUSH'S RECORD IN THE NATIONAL GUARD. AUTHOR JIM MORE HAS WRITTEN TWO BOOKS ON THE SUBJECT.

Rather: "YOU'VE STUDIED PRESIDENT BUSH'S RECORDS FOR 10 YEARS.. ARE THESE DOCUMENTS CONSISTENT WITH THE RECORD AS YOU KNOW IT?"

Moore: "THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY CONSISTENT WITH THE RECORDS AS I KNOW IT."

Rather: "PUT IT IN CONTEXT AND PERSPECTIVE FOR US ... THE STORY AND WHAT WE CALL THE COUNTERATTACK ON THE STORY. WHERE ARE WE RIGHT NOW?

Moore "I THINK WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS SOME INCRIMINATING DOCUMENTS HAVE COME OUT. THE WHITE HOUSE, YOU SHOULD REMEMBER, HAS NOT DISCREDITED THE DOCUMENTS. THEY'RE RELYING ON THE BLOGOSPHERE AND OTHER PEOPLE TO DO THAT. BECAUSE THE WHITE HOUSE PROBABLY KNOWS THESE DOCUMENTS ARE IN FACT REAL."

Rather Tag: The "60 Minutes" report was based NOT solely on the recovered documents .. but on a preponderance of evidence .. including documents that were provided by un-impeachable sources .. and interviews with former officials of the Texas National Guard. If any definitive evidence to the contrary of our story is found, we will report it.

So far, there is none.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama; US: District of Columbia; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2004electionbias; brithume; bush; cbs; cbslies; dannyrather; danratherbiased; disgraceful; dnctalkingpoints; downwiththeship; foxnews; fredbarnes; frequency; juanwilliams; jumpedtheshark; killian; lyingliar; mediabias; memos; outofworkhack; ratherbiased; resignnow; tang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 1,301-1,313 next last
To: mabelkitty

First, I do not understand #33. It needs a little more explanation.

Second, where did you hear that these documents were on sale on the internet? #35 How could someone know unless they had purchased them. This sounds fishy.

Third, it was reported that superscripting appeared in the body of the text, but did not appear in the centered address box. This matches default style settings of Word.


281 posted on 09/10/2004 3:39:09 PM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Marcel Matley

A and M Matley
PO Box 882401
San Francisco, CA 94188-2401

Bus (415) 753-2832
Bus (800) 367-8403
Fax (415) 753-3346
mmatley@aol.com
Document Examiner


282 posted on 09/10/2004 3:39:11 PM PDT by dep (Ense Petit Placidam Sub Libertate Qvietem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

What about Killian's widow and son??????????


283 posted on 09/10/2004 3:39:14 PM PDT by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

Don't get my hopes up....


284 posted on 09/10/2004 3:39:26 PM PDT by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Where are you guys seeing this? CBS here in L.A. is Judge Judy!


285 posted on 09/10/2004 3:39:30 PM PDT by BunnySlippers ("F" Stands for FLIP-FLOP ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11

Thank you... I also thought that I had seen a raised "th" in typed letters from England when I was small, and I remember too that the "th" was always underlined. So the superscript ALONE is not the point, but the KIND of superscripting is.


286 posted on 09/10/2004 3:39:31 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Yeah - be sure you don't mention it's ABC which hired over 6 document forensic experts who think they are fake docs.

Or the Washington Post. Or the family members saying that Killian couldn't type, and they didn't have these so-called "personal" files.

287 posted on 09/10/2004 3:39:33 PM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

http://www.forensic.org/experts/matley.html

Marcel Matley
A and M Matley
PO Box 882401
San Francisco, CA 94188-2401
Bus (415) 753-2832
Bus (800) 367-8403
Fax (415) 753-3346
mmatley@aol.com


Document Examiner


288 posted on 09/10/2004 3:39:39 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
He's talking about the QUESTIONS, not the documents?????

Aren't the questions to be raised about the documents the documents themselves?

289 posted on 09/10/2004 3:39:51 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: TheLion
Gen. Strong(sp) being quoted, but since they cannot ask Killian, they bring in someone with feelings about the documents.

This is so partisan and quite nasty.

290 posted on 09/10/2004 3:39:51 PM PDT by Maigrey (Kerry: Up-the-Mekong-without-a-paddle... - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: mhking

robert strong wont give a straigt answer! L0L


291 posted on 09/10/2004 3:39:51 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

Hey Dan - Ask Strong what kind of typewriter they used to have!


292 posted on 09/10/2004 3:39:58 PM PDT by shadowman99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Where are you guys seeing this?

East coast feeds.

293 posted on 09/10/2004 3:40:01 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Crawdad

Strong, who served in Texas, standing by his belief that they are genuiine. Compatible with docs of the time. Doesn't see anyting in docs that are discordent. Strong says highly charged political atmosphere......


294 posted on 09/10/2004 3:40:05 PM PDT by baseballmom (You Know Where I Stand - GW Bush - 9/2/04 We're standing with you, Mr. President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: mhking

power that was traded? huh?


295 posted on 09/10/2004 3:40:08 PM PDT by DaveMSmith (CEO, VRWC: When you think treason, don't think Benedict Arnold - think JOHN FORGED KERRY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: mhking
You mean Kenneth.
296 posted on 09/10/2004 3:40:14 PM PDT by Fabozz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

no..gotta be Scott Peterson


297 posted on 09/10/2004 3:40:14 PM PDT by USMA83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty

I had no idea that I was an operative. Last week I was called a 'fringe group'. Is any of this good for a resume.


298 posted on 09/10/2004 3:40:29 PM PDT by mlbford2 ("sycophantic kerry koolaid sucker" -- S. Hannity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

299 posted on 09/10/2004 3:40:37 PM PDT by Alouette (FONTGATE: The Media's New Clothes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
this thread is so long I don't know if anyone will read this. I just want to relate my take on Dan Rather and the organization that he represents.

On the morning of Septemeber 11, 2001, while the buildings were still burning in the background, Dan Rather told the world, "...We do not know who did this!"

I'm no genius, but even I was able to turn to my children and inform them: "That man is lying. Osama Bin Laden did this."

Dan Rather had zero credibility in my house from that day forward. In fact, he is considered an enemy sympathizer and a suspected traitor.

300 posted on 09/10/2004 3:40:39 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 1,301-1,313 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson