To: mabelkitty
I am not sure how this might impact the probable forgery, but in the .pdf file the P.O box is blacked out, but not enough to cover up the 34567. After one photocopy this number would not be visible. Photocopying machines, even when set to greyscale do not have the contrast resolution to be able to do this more than once. The only way this might be possible is if the document was put onto a digital scanner, obviously not available in the early 70s.
412 posted on
09/10/2004 2:15:32 PM PDT by
pghkevin
(Have you hugged your kids today? Have you thanked someone in the Military today?)
To: pghkevin
but in the .pdf file the P.O box is blacked out, but not enough to cover up the 34567. After one photocopy this number would not be visible. Blacked out in the very last copy.
440 posted on
09/10/2004 2:22:02 PM PDT by
narby
(CBS - The new Democrat 527)
To: pghkevin
am not sure how this might impact the probable forgery, but in the .pdf file the P.O box is blacked out, but not enough to cover up the 34567. After one photocopy this number would not be visible. Photocopying machines, even when set to greyscale do not have the contrast resolution to be able to do this more than once. The only way this might be possible is if the document was put onto a digital scanner, obviously not available in the early 70s.
Excellent point..if I read you correctly these were first generation copies, the un blackened ones would be originals..?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson