look at post 17 for a condensed view
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1211809/posts?page=17&17
I looked. It looks like the date format in your sample is also incorrect. Maybe the military isn't as regimented as was believed initially -- at least not in office procedures. Or perhaps the ANG wasn't a stickler for uniformity to the degree the regular military units were. That doesn't sound right to me but I don't know how else to explain it.