[been_lurking]

Can someone explain to me why the "burden of proof" is being placed on proving the documents are forged? It pre-supposes that the facts are as reported by CBS with no supporting evidence. It seems to me, we should be screaming loudly for CBS to prove they are authentic!

The real "burden of proof" belongs to CBS.
They have not shown anyone the original documents.
They have not identified their "document expert".
They have not identified the witnesses who vouched for the documents.
They have not provided a name for the source of the documents.

Cough up the facts CBS!

[doug from upland]

I think that with all the questions, the burden has been placed on CBS.