Replies

I have posted proof that the USAF (AFDSDC) tested and approved the use of this machine in 1969. President Bush was a pilot for the National Guard. Is it too far-fetched to believe that his commanders had access to USAF office space and equipment at the base?

It is critical to rule out this machine, because if the Composer is ruled-out, then these are fakes. Even if the memoes turn out to have been typed on an old Selectric Composer, without the originals there is no way to prove that they were not made 3 years ago or 3 weaks ago.

FR's credibility is at stake here, too.

Then someone find a Composer and type the memo. You have a good responsible theory - now it must be tested and compared in the face of the overwhelming evidence of another good responsible theory (MS Word) which satisfies Occam's Razor beyond a reasonable doubt.

I tried it in MS Word and got exactly the same document (allowing for painfully obvious faxing & copying in an attempt to "age" the "original") with practically no effort. The chance of two very different technologies giving the same results 30 years apart is nil.

Occam's Razor. A perfect duplicate is trivial to make on widely accessable technology ... vs. ... digging up a rare old Composer might produce something comparable. The MS Word theory wins hands-down unless you can create a duplicate document on a Composer (if you can find one). Go for it - I'm very curious about the results.

It is critical to rule out this machine, because if the Composer is ruled-out, then these are fakes.

Where your argument fails is that if you require proof that this puke vomited out by CBS is untrue, then any vomit produced by anyone must be proven to be untrue. Why must we credit the lying running dogs of CBS at all. Get a grip.