You've made a totally BS comparison, and I'm nearly positive you are intelligent enough to know that it is BS.
Alcohol is legal, but there are regulations on its usage that no-one really objects to (except of course when they are pulled over for DWI).
Or how 'bout the money and resources spent on this situation reported a week or so ago? What do you think was really accomplished?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1204895/posts
So, it's OK with you to pull someone over for no reason (with these roadblocks), test them against some arbitrary .08 BAC (it used to be higher, what happened?), take away their liberty, fine them an outrageous amount, suspend their license, etc. just because they MIGHT cause an accident?
In AMERICA?
I object to that! What's next, with that kind of logic?
"Or how 'bout the money and resources spent on this situation reported a week or so ago?"
What money? What resources? And what was the Michigan State Police supposed to do ... ignore it?