Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pot Smokers Comprise 75% Of Illicit Drug Users, Federal Study Says
NORML News ^ | September 9, 2004 | NORML

Posted on 09/10/2004 8:05:17 AM PDT by cryptical

Washington, DC: Three out of four illicit drug users in the United States are marijuana smokers, according to survey data released today by the Department of Health and Human Services.

According to the department's annual "National Survey on Drug Use and Health," an estimated 19.5 million Americans currently use illicit drugs (as defined as use within the past month). Of these, 14.6 million - or 75 percent - self-identify as marijuana smokers.

By comparison, only 2.3 million Americans reported using cocaine, approximately one million reported using LSD, and fewer than 120,000 said that they currently use heroin.

In addition, an estimated 97 million Americans - slightly more than 40 percent of the US population age 12 or older - have used marijuana during their lifetimes, the study noted.

NORML Foundation Executive Director Allen St. Pierre said that the prevalence of marijuana consumers compared to other illicit drugs begs for a change in the federal law. "Americans clearly delineate between the use of marijuana and the use of more dangerous substances like cocaine and heroin," he said. "Like the use of alcohol and tobacco, marijuana use is an acknowledged part of the American culture and economy. It is consumed by tens of millions of Americans, relatively few of which suffer significant deleterious health consequences due to their use. It is time for our public policies to reflect this reality and regulate marijuana in a manner similar to alcohol and tobacco."

For more information, please contact either Allen St. Pierre or Paul Armentano of the NORML Foundation at (202) 483-5500. Full text of the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health is available online at:
http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda.htm#NHSDAinfo



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 911whocaresgimmedope; dopeb4country; dopeb4duty; dopeb4family; dopeb4responsibility; dopeheads; dopeisallthatmatters; dopers; dopeworshippers; drugwar; gatewaydrug; gimmegimmedope; gimmegimmegimmedope; hitaxsowhatgimmedope; leroywhathappened; marijuana; pot; shortpeople; warwhocaresgimmedope; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500501-511 last
To: robertpaulsen
Taters dedrived the "anti-Christian" nature of drugs from their "anti-family" nature. Care to explain how marijuana is intrinsically more anti-family than alcohol?
501 posted on 09/15/2004 9:50:46 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights; sweet_taters
Did sweet_taters use the word "intrinsically"? The only people I've seen use that word are of the weasel type when they wish to avoid reality. Ah, the Libertarian fantasy world.

Are you accurately portraying his statement when you ask how marijuana is intrinsically more anti-family than alcohol?

Or, did sweet_taters simply say "drugs are anti-family"?

Nasty habit of yours -- twisting the poster's words.

OK. You've pushed this thread to the >500 mark. Report to Soros that your job is complete and have him send your check. No need to drag this on any further with your stupid, irrelevant, off-topic, misrepresentative ramblings.

502 posted on 09/15/2004 10:06:52 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
Taters dedrived the "anti-Christian" nature of drugs from their "anti-family" nature.

He also declared that no conservative, Republican Christian would question the gateway theory. Somehow he managed to miss the fact that Raymond Shafer, who quite fits that description, and the Shafer Comission did exactly that.

503 posted on 09/15/2004 10:09:17 AM PDT by tacticalogic ( Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Did sweet_taters use the word "intrinsically"?

He couldn't have meant by "drugs are anti-family" only that their use can get you arrested to the detriment of your family, because he offered that claim as a counterargument not to drug use but to an "open policy on drug use" (i.e. legalization).

The only people I've seen use that word are of the weasel type when they wish to avoid reality.

I never denied the reality that illegal drugs can get you arrested.

Are you accurately portraying his statement when you ask how marijuana is intrinsically more anti-family than alcohol?

It was not my intent to portray his statement at all. Is your foolish question an attempt to weasel out of answering mine?

504 posted on 09/15/2004 10:17:15 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
Somehow he managed to miss the fact

I can't think of a fact he hasn't missed.

505 posted on 09/15/2004 10:18:35 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

Comment #506 Removed by Moderator

To: sweet_taters
Sorry, should have copied you on post 504.
507 posted on 09/15/2004 10:20:03 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: sweet_taters
Listen, moron. Just because you found one wacko group of hippies pretending to be Christian does not prove anything. Drugs tear families apart. Do I need to show you a website about it, or can you take that fact on faith?

Moron I may be, but a dupe I'm not. I don't take anything on faith. Unless you can walk on water and raise the dead, your word has no more credibility than any other skid row wino.

If drugs tore a family apart, I don't think it was much of a family to begin with. Nothing can tear a good family apart!

Your method of scapegoating others can easily be used to scapegoat Christians, who are the majority of prison inmates.
Reference:
Denise Golumbaski
Research Analyst
Federal Bureau of Prisons

Catholic.............39.164%
Protestant...........35.008%
Rasta.................1.987%
Jewish................1.773%
Church of Christ......1.744%
Pentecostal...........1.463%
Jehovah Witness.......0.890%
Adventist.............0.831%
Orthodox..............0.502%
Mormon................0.399%
Atheist...............0.210%

Deist and Pagan did not even make the list.
Looking at the above, it's obvious that we can decrease the number of criminals in America by decreasing the number of Christians.

Outrages use of statistics? Of course it is...The same way you scapegoat hippies and druggies.

Be careful, your alienation of others may come back to haunt you. If you doubt that, remember the halocaust. It was the Jews last time, but could just as easily be Christians next time.
508 posted on 09/15/2004 11:00:58 AM PDT by mugs99 (Restore the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
"Is your foolish question an attempt to weasel out of answering mine?"

You took a general statement and twisted it into a drug-specific, hypothetical comparison to alcohol. Of course I won't answer it. I told you I'm tired of your trying to compare marijuana to alcohol -- I'm certainly not going to encourage it.

Drugs are anti-family. Argue that, if you wish, since it is you who wish all drugs to be legal and freely available at the 7-11.

509 posted on 09/15/2004 11:04:25 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
I'm tired of your trying to compare marijuana to alcohol

Of course you are, as it exposes your insincerity in the "principles" you put forth in support of drug criminalization.

Drugs are anti-family. Argue that, if you wish

Not until I know if you really believe that ... does it also apply to the drug alcohol?

it is you who wish all drugs to be legal and freely available at the 7-11.

When did I say that?

510 posted on 09/15/2004 11:16:35 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies]

To: sweet_taters

"Dear Lord Snot:"

Wow, are we off our meds today?


511 posted on 09/16/2004 1:44:09 PM PDT by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500501-511 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson