To: SunkenCiv
Dan Rather probably had nothing to do with this particular fiasco, but he needs to be retired anyway. </i? Somewhere on here today I read that the staffers were upset because Rather insisted this go on last night.
127 posted on
09/09/2004 11:03:40 PM PDT by
Howlin
(What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
To: Howlin
Yeah! If this brings that [characterization omitted] down, I'm going to celebrate by ordering a pizza (that's a huge celebration for yours truly). He suppressed the story of Monica's dress for what, a year? Two? And of course, the real story -- Clinton's corrupt administration -- then got suppressed in favor of lies about Ken Starr and (mostly) true but spun stories about the dress. George W. Bush will be reelected by a margin of at least ten per cent
160 posted on
09/09/2004 11:20:03 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
To: Howlin
Good one. Rather's minions are already washing their hands of him. Time to hang up your microphone, Dan.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson