Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lunatic Fringe

I'll give you 3 guesses and the first two Terry McAuliffe stooges don;t count.


3 posted on 09/09/2004 9:17:28 PM PDT by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: commish

Well, the maroons over on the DUmpster say the fakes were planted on unsuspecting CBS by the nefarious Karl Rove!


12 posted on 09/09/2004 9:22:26 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: commish

Don't have a clue, but wouldn't it be fun if, after CBS showed those forged memos to the WH and the WH returned them saying only something about 'dirty politics' - wouldn't it just be a hoot if the WH also handed CBS a length of rope for them to do with as they saw fit?

It is hard to believe that someone in the WH did not recognize exactly what a pile of forged excrement CBS was waving around.

Very very hard to believe. I wonder if they will ever stop underestimating President Bush? I hope not.


13 posted on 09/09/2004 9:22:30 PM PDT by SusaninOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: commish

25 posted on 09/09/2004 9:27:15 PM PDT by Howlin (What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: commish

THE CBS PAPERS [Jed Babbin]
I spoke to Col. Bill Campenni (USAF ret) earlier this morning. As I've written before, Campenni was a member of the President's squadron and flew with him often. Campenni told me that there are a whole slew of reasons -- beyond those being debated now -- to question the authenticity of the CBS papers:

1. The 4 May 1972 order and the 1 August 1972 memo both have a letterhead for the wrong organization. Correspondence and orders in those days would be issued in the name of the parent organization -- the 147th Fighter Interceptor Group -- rather than the squadron. The letterhead is typed. They used printed ANG letterhead;

2. Orders were issued on the standard USAF orders form. (I still have a stack of my old ones. There's not a "memo" among them). Campenni remembers that orders weren't issued as "memos" like the 4 May 72 document;

3. The Killian "CYA" memo of August 1973 refers to pressure by Gen. Standt. The problem with this is that Standt retired in 1972. Why would anyone be worried about pressure from him?

4. Jerry Killian, according to Campenni, never went near a typewriter. In the Air Force, in those days, notes -- if anyone kept them at all -- were handwritten. That raises questions about both the 19 May 72 and the 18 August 73 memos. And, lest we forget, bureaucrats -- not fighter jocks -- write "cya" memos.

5. Orders -- like the purported 4 May 72 order to take the flight physical - wouldn't normally have been signed by Killian. They would be signed by a senior sergeant "by order of" Killian.

If, as it appears, someone faked these papers they did a bad job of it. I can tell you that in the early to mid-1970's when I was on active duty, the active service didn't have anything fancier than the earliest models of the IBM Selectric typewriter, and many offices didn't even have those. The reserves and national guard had our cast-offs, so it's terribly unlikely they could have produced anything as fancy as these papers. (Is it just my imagination, or is Dan Rather's nose growing longer every day?)
Posted at 10:38 AM


213 posted on 09/10/2004 8:10:32 AM PDT by NEBO (You don't create terrorists by fighting back. You defeat the terrorists by fighting back. ~GWBush~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson