Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JCEccles
I got the same education today about the difference between Army and Air Force abbreviations. Looks like the forger screwed up the Air Force abbreviation anyway.

In the Army, the signature on a letterhead document would be "Commanding" not "Commander." True for the Air Force?

Compare the alleged Memo/Order with one of Kerry's orders from his own website, which is typical of the format I saw in the Army, adjusting for service differences. Note the different typeface and format. http://www.johnkerry.com/pdf/jkmilservice/Bupers_Orders_To_Gridley.pdf

87 posted on 09/09/2004 4:17:13 PM PDT by colorado tanker (wanna see my happy hat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker
In the Army, the signature on a letterhead document would be "Commanding" not "Commander." True for the Air Force?

Actually, "Commander" is the correct Air Force signature block designation.

The Air Force had a little twist where they would allow someone to sign as "Acting Commander" if the commander was off station, but they eliminated that allowance in the late 70s. Someone holding appropriate delegated authorIty might sign something "FOR THE COMMANDER" (all caps) too. Only someone on G-series orders was allowed to sign as commander.

108 posted on 09/09/2004 4:26:13 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson