Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
Please read before posting. Does the expert in post #1 say that? No

Then why are you repeating it? There are problems, but we need to avoid making untrue statements.

From the expert's analysis:

I also plan to ask Dr. Bouffard more detail about the nature of the "th" on the end of dates, though in our first conversation he indicated that some typewriters had the capability to do something in that format.


The point I was trying to make, is that most documents would not have had anything like the 04 May 1972. Look at the original and it has this as the unit header

111th Fighter Interceptor Squadron

Yet, in the body of the letter on the second line, this is the format

2. Report to 111thF.I.S.

Another note on the abreviation of the unit, the unit should have been FIS without periods.

Original thread with the memos.
Here

76 posted on 09/09/2004 2:17:45 PM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Charter member of the VRWC - and proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Arrowhead1952

There are lots of problems with the documents, but I refuse to believe they weren't done in imitation of real documents. I believe the "personal" documents were provided by an anti-Bush family member.


80 posted on 09/09/2004 2:20:31 PM PDT by js1138 (Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson