Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach
I think we might be shooting ourselves in the foot here. Apparently there were purportional typewriters then in existence. That the word breaks come out the same only mean the guy's a good typist (or had his secretary do it). It's just "correct" spacing, big deal.

It's apparent that the Lt. Col wrote these for CYA (Cover Your Ass) so obviously he would make anyone else out to look bad, himself, good.

Bottom line, these memo's aren't that damning. All they say is exactly what Bush said happened. It's just written in a scornful tone, exactly what you'd think someone would do in a "CYA" memo.

Making a big deal out of this may backfire. These memo's aren't worth it.

We should concentrate on Kerry's work in the VVAW for the Viet Cong.

154 posted on 09/09/2004 12:37:39 PM PDT by narby (CBS - The new Democrat 527)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: narby

The guy on Little Green Footballs has superimposed the pdf of the memo from the CBS website with one he created with MS Word in Times New Roman 12. They are exact, perfect, inerrant duplicates.


158 posted on 09/09/2004 12:41:51 PM PDT by Buckhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

To: narby

I completely agree with you regarding the VVAW. And that will be handled by former POW's.

In the interim, this from a military freeper:

1--the month in a military date is always three letters. August is spelled out.

2--no one issues an "order" through a "memo." Maybe a letter, but nothing as informal as a "memo."

3--the signature (initials) of Lt. Col. Killian is clearly a cut-and-paste job. The last letter ("K") is cut off at the top, where two lines start to curve toward each other in a loop. Impossible to to do by hand. This signature was cut from another document and pasted or taped on the document.

4--No letterhead. Do you really think commanders typed out a the squadron on every letter? No. Letterhead was used.

5--No way there were superscripts back then. No way. Even if it was theoretically possible (which it wasn't), the national guard isn't exactly an early-adopter of technology. This ability wasn't even available at any price for several years.


159 posted on 09/09/2004 12:41:56 PM PDT by Peach (The Clinton's pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

To: narby
All they say is exactly what Bush said happened. It's just written in a scornful tone, exactly what you'd think someone would do in a "CYA" memo

Not uncommon among officers, BTW, nor is the scorn heaped upon the part-timers by the full-timers. Just a fact of life in the military, especially the Guard and Reserves.

186 posted on 09/09/2004 1:09:10 PM PDT by outlawcam (No time to waste. Now get moving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson