To: faludeh_shirazi
using the radical methods of calling teenagers 16-18 "Innocent children" is detrimental because it gives this cause a close tie with the STUPID, the IGNORANT, the other radicals who use "the children" as their crutch.
A 16-18 year old is HARDLY an "innocent child"!
I read articles as far as I find the FIRST LIE.
a gross exaggeration or 'misleading statement' is still a LIE.
7 posted on
09/09/2004 8:35:28 AM PDT by
steplock
To: steplock
Teenagers are clearly children. What world do you inhabit?
23 posted on
09/09/2004 9:31:26 AM PDT by
justshutupandtakeit
(My Father was 10x the hero John Fraud Kerry is.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson