To: TastyManatees
"You should call CNS News. Their experts say the "golf ball" typewriter (the IBM Selectric Composer) was the only one to do this at the time, they cost $20,000, and they weren't widely used.
"
Then their experts are not experts. They're incorrect. The IBM Executive was introduced in the 1940's and I guarandamntee you it had proportional fonts.
586 posted on
09/09/2004 12:12:01 PM PDT by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: MineralMan; girlscout
I say forget the typewriter.
The phony signature is the real smoking gun.
589 posted on
09/09/2004 12:16:15 PM PDT by
Fresh Wind
(Gen. G.S. Patton: There is no soap ever invented that can wash that blood off (Kerry's) hands.)
To: MineralMan
"The IBM Executive was introduced in the 1940's and I guarandamntee you it had proportional fonts."
____________________________________
According to IBM the Executive was introduced in the 1950's and used the traditional hammer style type . Hammer type cannot produce proportional "fonts".
To: MineralMan
Heh. The expert who said that was "Allan Haley, director of words and letters at Agfa Monotype in Wilmington, Mass." Give CNS News a call and tell them you know better.
615 posted on
09/09/2004 12:33:42 PM PDT by
TastyManatees
(http://www.tastymanatees.com)
To: MineralMan
The originals and the word mock up superimpose nearly pixel for pixel !!!
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=12526
See: UPDATE at 9/9/04 11:28:55 am:
I don't care if a $5000 typewriter in 1971 could have produced proportional fonts, this is not posible.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson