[MizSterious]

What I find particularly interesting is how the media (including Fox to some degree) manages to interpret these memos, and how few of them ever read them entirely. You know, on the Scott Peterson case, which is relatively of no national importance, Court TV and others manage to reproduce transcripts on the screen as they read what's on them. Yet the news media just "describes" these memos, in terms that suit their agenda(s).

That said, however, I'm still troubled by the differences in signatures.

[cyncooper]

I saw some general differences in some signatures but assign it to fitting a signature into a box. My thought is one was going to cook up documents they'd at least make them damaging to GWB.

For those who haven't read them, here they are. Scroll down to links in this CBS article (which--SURPRISE!--completely distorts the contents):

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/09/08/60II/main641984.shtml

[Howlin]

and how few of them ever read them entirely.

They really do not "read" like CBS interpreted them, IMO.