[jennyp]

I think I've found evidence of at least one of the memos being run through the same copier multiple times.

Here's a closeup of the Aug 1, 1972 memo:

(The rest of the dots look like random noise.)

[LowOiL]

BTTT, That is very fishy.

[nopardons]

bttt

[Law is not justice but process]

Excellent observation, jennyp. To summarize:

1. The forged memos can be exactly reproduced on MS word.

2. No one has come up with a reasonable explanation for the superscripts on 111th and 187th.

3. Memos were copied multiple times on the same machine.

4. Even a 4 year-old child can tell the signatures of Killian on the forgeries differ from his signatures on officially released documents (not even close, the order and types of pen strokes on the K differ in 3 ways alone)

5. The timing and content of the memos are best described as suspicious.

Conclusion: they are undeniably forgeries. The signature alone establishes that.

[GOP_1900AD]

More evidence I missed back then. Fascinating. The second look damns the forgeries even more!