To: PhatHead
"Another giveaway on this is the superscript "th" on 111th which appears in paragraph 2 of the "order" memo. Typewriters don't do reduced font superscripts. And if they did, why not do it in the header, too."
Wow, that's a good one. Something I noticed which is odd is that the 'e's aren't all the same, some have the horizontal bar at a slant, some straight, some squashed, some open. I don't know how you do that on a typewriter, much less a laser printer. Maybe you could get that on a dot matrix (which would have not been possible).
To: FastCoyote
Something I noticed which is odd is that the 'e's aren't all the same, some have the horizontal bar at a slant, some straight, some squashed, some open. I don't know how you do that on a typewriter, much less a laser printer.
Abnormal print quality isn't odd on an old typewriter -- in fact if it wasn't uneven then I would suspect a laser printer. I looked around on the docs to see if all the letters were exactly the same, and there's a few differences. That might of been caused by scanning them in for the web though.
401 posted on
09/09/2004 8:50:56 AM PDT by
lelio
To: FastCoyote
the 'e's aren't all the same, some have the horizontal bar at a slant, some straight, some squashed, some open But these kinds of distortions can happen when you do multiple copies...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson